FabDigitFabDigit

Nickel Alloy Alloy 333 vs Rene 41

Nickel Alloy · grade comparison

Nickel Alloy Alloy 333 and Rene 41 are both nickel alloy grades. Rene 41 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 1,060 MPa (154 ksi) against 310 MPa (45 ksi) for Alloy 333, about 3.4 times as much; tensile strength follows at 1,420 MPa (206 ksi) vs 690 MPa (100 ksi). In exchange, Alloy 333 is the more ductile: elongation 50% versus 14% for Rene 41, and Rene 41 is harder (350 HB vs 190 HB). Rene 41 is stiffer (218 GPa vs 203 GPa) and Alloy 333 runs hotter in service (1,100°C vs 870°C continuous). On the shop floor, Alloy 333 machines more easily (poor vs not recommended) and Alloy 333 welds better (very good vs poor).

Alloy 333Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

Rene 41Choose it when strength drives the design.

Alloy 333 vs Rene 41: properties

Alloy 333Rene 41

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

203 GPa29.4 Msi
218 GPa31.6 Msi

Shear Modulus

78 GPa11.3 Msi
85 GPa12.3 Msi

Bulk Modulus

165 GPa23.9 Msi
190 GPa27.6 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

690 MPa100 ksi
1,420 MPa206 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

310 MPa45 ksi
1,060 MPa154 ksi

Elongation at Break

50%
14%

Reduction in Area

55%
20%

Compressive Strength

320 MPa46.4 ksi
1,100 MPa160 ksi

Shear Strength

450 MPa65.3 ksi
830 MPa120 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

290 MPa42.1 ksi
480 MPa69.6 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

110 MPa·√m100 ksi·√in
95 MPa·√m86.5 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

150 J111 ft·lbf
30 J22.1 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

190 HB
350 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

90 HRB
—

Hardness, Rockwell C

10 HRC
38 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

200 HV
375 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.31

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.14 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³
8.25 g/cm³0.3 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,330°C2,426 °F
1,315°C2,399 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,400°C2,552 °F
1,370°C2,498 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

11 W/m·K6.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F
9 W/m·K5.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
420 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

13.9 µm/m·K7.7 µin/in·°F
12.1 µm/m·K6.7 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

285 J/g123 BTU/lb
290 J/g125 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

1,100°C2,012 °F
870°C1,598 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-253°C-423 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

1.5 % IACS
1.3 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.16×10⁻⁶ Ω·m45.7 µΩ·in
1.31×10⁻⁶ Ω·m51.6 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.15 V
-0.1 V

Corrosion Resistance

72 / 100
78 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

25 / 100
12 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

12%
10%

Weldability

78 / 100
25 / 100

Formability (cold)

70 / 100
20 / 100

Castability

40 / 100
30 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

65 / 100
45 / 100

Same in both: Polishability 70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

165 MJ/kg70,937 BTU/lb
230 MJ/kg98,882 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12.5 kg CO₂/kg
17 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

400 L/kg47.9 gal/lb
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 35%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

85 kN·m/kg
172 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

24.9 MN·m/kg
26.4 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

237 kJ/m³
2,577 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

2.9 mm²/s
2.6 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

3
5

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every nickel alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0006.577.588.59Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleAlloy 333Rene 41

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityAlloy 333Rene 41
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 3 finishes: Gold Plating, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

Alloy 333 vs Rene 41 — frequently asked

Is Rene 41 stronger than Alloy 333?

Yes. Rene 41 has a typical yield strength of 1,060 MPa (154 ksi) against 310 MPa (45 ksi) for Alloy 333 — about 3.4 times as much. Tensile strength is 1,420 MPa (206 ksi) vs 690 MPa (100 ksi).

Which is cheaper, Alloy 333 or Rene 41?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, Alloy 333 or Rene 41?

Alloy 333. Its machinability rates poor (25/100) against not recommended (12/100) for Rene 41; for welding the order is Alloy 333 first (very good, 78/100) then Rene 41 (poor, 25/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Alloy 333 and Rene 41 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.