FabDigitFabDigit

Oak vs Radiata Pine

Natural Material · grade comparison

Oak and Radiata Pine are both natural material grades. Oak is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 95 MPa (13.8 ksi) against 90 MPa (13.1 ksi) for Radiata Pine, about 6% more. Radiata Pine is lighter (0.48 g/cm³ vs 0.72 g/cm³ for Oak) and Oak is stiffer (12.3 GPa vs 10.2 GPa). On the shop floor, Radiata Pine machines more easily (excellent vs very good) and Radiata Pine sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than Oak (standard, $$).

OakChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

Radiata PineChoose it when weight is the constraint, or when the part is machined in volume.

Oak vs Radiata Pine: properties

OakRadiata Pine

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

12.3 GPa1.8 Msi
10.2 GPa1.5 Msi

Shear Modulus

1.1 GPa0.16 Msi
0.7 GPa0.1 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

95 MPa13.8 ksi
90 MPa13.1 ksi

Compressive Strength

50 MPa7.3 ksi
42 MPa6.1 ksi

Flexural Strength

100 MPa14.5 ksi
81 MPa11.7 ksi

Shear Strength

14 MPa2 ksi
12 MPa1.7 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

0.5 MPa·√m0.46 ksi·√in
0.4 MPa·√m0.36 ksi·√in

Hardness, Mohs

2.5
—

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.37 · Elongation at Break 1%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

0.72 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³
0.48 g/cm³0.02 lb/in³

Porosity

52%
68%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.17 W/m·K0.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.12 W/m·K0.07 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,650 J/kg·K0.39 BTU/lb·°F
1,600 J/kg·K0.38 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

4.5 µm/m·K2.5 µin/in·°F
4 µm/m·K2.2 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

90°C194 °F
80°C176 °F

Min Service Temperature

-60°C-76 °F
-50°C-58 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁰ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁷ µΩ·in
1×10⁹ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁶ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

4 kV/mm102 V/mil
3 kV/mm76.2 V/mil

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

50 / 100
22 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

70 / 100
90 / 100

Polishability

65 / 100
50 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

11 MJ/kg4,729 BTU/lb
9 MJ/kg3,869 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

0.55 kg CO₂/kg
0.3 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

5%
0%

Same in both: Embodied Water 500 L/kg59.9 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

132 kN·m/kg
188 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

17.1 MN·m/kg
21.3 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

0.1 mm²/s
0.2 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every natural material grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityOakRadiata Pine
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$ Budget
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Oak vs Radiata Pine — frequently asked

Is Oak stronger than Radiata Pine?

Yes. Oak has a typical tensile strength of 95 MPa (13.8 ksi) against 90 MPa (13.1 ksi) for Radiata Pine — about 6% more.

Which is cheaper, Oak or Radiata Pine?

Radiata Pine is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while Oak is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, Oak or Radiata Pine?

Radiata Pine. Its machinability rates excellent (90/100) against very good (70/100) for Oak.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Oak and Radiata Pine side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.