FabDigitFabDigit

Hard Maple vs Oak

Natural Material · grade comparison

Hard Maple and Oak are both natural material grades. Hard Maple is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 108 MPa (15.7 ksi) against 95 MPa (13.8 ksi) for Oak, about 14% more. Hard Maple is the more ductile: elongation 1.5% versus 1% for Oak.

Hard MapleChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

Hard Maple vs Oak: properties

Hard MapleOak

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

12.6 GPa1.8 Msi
12.3 GPa1.8 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.42
0.37

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

108 MPa15.7 ksi
95 MPa13.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

1.5%
1%

Compressive Strength

54 MPa7.8 ksi
50 MPa7.3 ksi

Flexural Strength

109 MPa15.8 ksi
100 MPa14.5 ksi

Shear Strength

16 MPa2.3 ksi
14 MPa2 ksi

Hardness, Mohs

—
2.5

Same in both: Shear Modulus 1.1 GPa0.16 Msi · Fracture Toughness (K_IC) 0.5 MPa·√m0.46 ksi·√in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

0.7 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³
0.72 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³

Porosity

53%
52%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.16 W/m·K0.09 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.17 W/m·K0.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,900 J/kg·K0.45 BTU/lb·°F
1,650 J/kg·K0.39 BTU/lb·°F

Same in both: Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 4.5 µm/m·K2.5 µin/in·°F · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 90°C194 °F · Min Service Temperature -60°C-76 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10⁹ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁶ µΩ·in
1×10¹⁰ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁷ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

—
4 kV/mm102 V/mil

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

30 / 100
50 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Polishability

85 / 100
65 / 100

Same in both: Machinability 70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

12 MJ/kg5,159 BTU/lb
11 MJ/kg4,729 BTU/lb

Embodied Water

600 L/kg71.9 gal/lb
500 L/kg59.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

0%
5%

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 0.55 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

154 kN·m/kg
132 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

18 MN·m/kg
17.1 MN·m/kg

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every natural material grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityHard MapleOak
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Hard Maple vs Oak — frequently asked

Is Hard Maple stronger than Oak?

Yes. Hard Maple has a typical tensile strength of 108 MPa (15.7 ksi) against 95 MPa (13.8 ksi) for Oak — about 14% more.

Which is cheaper, Hard Maple or Oak?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

When should I choose Hard Maple over Oak?

Pick Hard Maple when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Hard Maple and Oak side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.