FabDigitFabDigit

CLT vs OSB

Natural Material · grade comparison

CLT and OSB are both natural material grades. CLT is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 16 MPa (2.32 ksi) against 12 MPa (1.74 ksi) for OSB, about 33% more. CLT is lighter (0.47 g/cm³ vs 0.64 g/cm³ for OSB) and CLT is stiffer (11 GPa vs 3.5 GPa). On the shop floor, OSB sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than CLT (standard, $$).

CLTChoose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

OSBChoose it when the part sees heat, or when cost is the deciding factor.

CLT vs OSB: properties

CLTOSB

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

11 GPa1.6 Msi
3.5 GPa0.51 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.69 GPa0.1 Msi
1.1 GPa0.16 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.3
0.25

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

16 MPa2.3 ksi
12 MPa1.7 ksi

Elongation at Break

0.9%
1%

Compressive Strength

21 MPa3 ksi
16 MPa2.3 ksi

Flexural Strength

24 MPa3.5 ksi
22 MPa3.2 ksi

Shear Strength

4 MPa0.51 ksi
7 MPa0.99 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

0.4 MPa·√m0.36 ksi·√in
0.65 MPa·√m0.59 ksi·√in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

0.47 g/cm³0.02 lb/in³
0.64 g/cm³0.02 lb/in³

Porosity

65%
57%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.12 W/m·K0.07 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.13 W/m·K0.08 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,600 J/kg·K0.38 BTU/lb·°F
1,700 J/kg·K0.41 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

4.5 µm/m·K2.5 µin/in·°F
7 µm/m·K3.9 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

55°C131 °F
60°C140 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -50°C-58 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

4 kV/mm102 V/mil
—

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10⁸ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁵ µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

45 / 100
30 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

92 / 100
85 / 100

Polishability

35 / 100
12 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

9 MJ/kg3,869 BTU/lb
15 MJ/kg6,449 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

0.42 kg CO₂/kg
0.45 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

2%
5%

Embodied Water

—
20 L/kg2.4 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

34 kN·m/kg
19 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

23.4 MN·m/kg
5.5 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

0.2 mm²/s
0.1 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every natural material grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityCLTOSB
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$ Budget
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

CLT vs OSB — frequently asked

Is CLT stronger than OSB?

Yes. CLT has a typical tensile strength of 16 MPa (2.32 ksi) against 12 MPa (1.74 ksi) for OSB — about 33% more.

Which is cheaper, CLT or OSB?

OSB is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while CLT is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, CLT or OSB?

CLT, by a small margin. Both rate excellent for machinability — 92/100 against 85/100 for OSB.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in CLT and OSB side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.