FabDigitFabDigit

Chrome-Tanned Leather vs SAE F-1 Wool Felt

Natural Material · grade comparison

Chrome-Tanned Leather and SAE F-1 Wool Felt are both natural material grades. Chrome-Tanned Leather is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 26 MPa (3.77 ksi) against 3 MPa (0.406 ksi) for SAE F-1 Wool Felt, about 9.3 times as much. Chrome-Tanned Leather is the more ductile: elongation 48% versus 40% for SAE F-1 Wool Felt. SAE F-1 Wool Felt is lighter (0.32 g/cm³ vs 0.9 g/cm³ for Chrome-Tanned Leather) and Chrome-Tanned Leather is stiffer (0.3 GPa vs 0.01 GPa).

Chrome-Tanned LeatherChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

SAE F-1 Wool FeltChoose it when weight is the constraint.

Chrome-Tanned Leather vs SAE F-1 Wool Felt: properties

Chrome-Tanned LeatherSAE F-1 Wool Felt

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0.3 GPa0.04 Msi
0.01 GPa0 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.4
—

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

26 MPa3.8 ksi
3 MPa0.41 ksi

Elongation at Break

48%
40%

Compressive Strength

15 MPa2.2 ksi
1 MPa0.15 ksi

Shear Strength

12 MPa1.7 ksi
—

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

0.9 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³
0.32 g/cm³0.01 lb/in³

Porosity

50%
75%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.16 W/m·K0.09 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.05 W/m·K0.03 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,500 J/kg·K0.36 BTU/lb·°F
1,360 J/kg·K0.32 BTU/lb·°F

Min Service Temperature

-30°C-22 °F
-50°C-58 °F

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 100°C212 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10⁹ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁶ µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

40 / 100
45 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

78 / 100
85 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
—

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

140 MJ/kg60,189 BTU/lb
63 MJ/kg27,085 BTU/lb

Embodied Water

17,000 L/kg2,037 gal/lb
100,000 L/kg11,983 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12 kg CO₂/kg · Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

29 kN·m/kg
9 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

0.3 MN·m/kg
0 MN·m/kg

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every natural material grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityChrome-Tanned LeatherSAE F-1 Wool Felt
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Chrome-Tanned Leather vs SAE F-1 Wool Felt — frequently asked

Is Chrome-Tanned Leather stronger than SAE F-1 Wool Felt?

Yes. Chrome-Tanned Leather has a typical tensile strength of 26 MPa (3.77 ksi) against 3 MPa (0.406 ksi) for SAE F-1 Wool Felt — about 9.3 times as much.

Which is cheaper, Chrome-Tanned Leather or SAE F-1 Wool Felt?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, Chrome-Tanned Leather or SAE F-1 Wool Felt?

SAE F-1 Wool Felt. Its machinability rates excellent (85/100) against very good (78/100) for Chrome-Tanned Leather.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Chrome-Tanned Leather and SAE F-1 Wool Felt side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.