FabDigitFabDigit

Borofloat 33 vs Lead Glass (IEC G-500)

Glass · grade comparison

Borofloat 33 and Lead Glass (IEC G-500) are both glass grades. Lead Glass (IEC G-500) is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 45 MPa (6.53 ksi) against 35 MPa (5.08 ksi) for Borofloat 33, about 29% more. Borofloat 33 is harder — 480 HV against 420 HV for Lead Glass (IEC G-500) — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. Borofloat 33 is lighter (2.23 g/cm³ vs 3.1 g/cm³ for Lead Glass (IEC G-500)) and Borofloat 33 runs hotter in service (450°C vs 350°C continuous). On the shop floor, Borofloat 33 sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than Lead Glass (IEC G-500) (premium, $$$).

Borofloat 33Choose it when surface hardness matters, or when weight is the constraint.

Lead Glass (IEC G-500)Choose it when strength drives the design.

Borofloat 33 vs Lead Glass (IEC G-500): properties

Borofloat 33Lead Glass (IEC G-500)

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

64 GPa9.3 Msi
62 GPa9 Msi

Shear Modulus

26.7 GPa3.9 Msi
25 GPa3.6 Msi

Bulk Modulus

36 GPa5.2 Msi
39 GPa5.7 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.2
0.22

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

35 MPa5.1 ksi
45 MPa6.5 ksi

Compressive Strength

1,000 MPa145 ksi
700 MPa102 ksi

Flexural Strength

25 MPa3.6 ksi
60 MPa8.7 ksi

Shear Strength

25 MPa3.6 ksi
—

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

0.77 MPa·√m0.7 ksi·√in
0.65 MPa·√m0.59 ksi·√in

Hardness, Vickers

480 HV
420 HV

Hardness, Knoop

480 HK
380 HK

Hardness, Mohs

6
5.5

Same in both: Elongation at Break 0%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.23 g/cm³0.08 lb/in³
3.1 g/cm³0.11 lb/in³

Refractive Index

1.471
1.56

Light Transmission

92%
90%

Same in both: Porosity 0%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

1.2 W/m·K0.69 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.9 W/m·K0.52 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

830 J/kg·K0.2 BTU/lb·°F
500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

3.3 µm/m·K1.8 µin/in·°F
9.1 µm/m·K5.1 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

450°C842 °F
350°C662 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-190°C-310 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in
1×10¹⁵ Ω·m3.94×10²² µΩ·in

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

4.6
6.7

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.0037
0.0012

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁷ Ω·cm

Same in both: Dielectric Strength 30 kV/mm762 V/mil

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

92 / 100
68 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

12 / 100
15 / 100

Same in both: Polishability 95 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

25 MJ/kg10,748 BTU/lb
18 MJ/kg7,739 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

1.8 kg CO₂/kg
1.4 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

10%
20%

Same in both: Embodied Water 15 L/kg1.8 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

16 kN·m/kg
15 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

28.7 MN·m/kg
20 MN·m/kg

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.6 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every glass grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005002.533.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleBorofloat 33

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityBorofloat 33Lead Glass (IEC G-500)
Default conditionAnnealed Glass—
Relative cost$$ Standard$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Borofloat 33 vs Lead Glass (IEC G-500) — frequently asked

Is Lead Glass (IEC G-500) stronger than Borofloat 33?

Yes. Lead Glass (IEC G-500) has a typical tensile strength of 45 MPa (6.53 ksi) against 35 MPa (5.08 ksi) for Borofloat 33 — about 29% more.

Which is cheaper, Borofloat 33 or Lead Glass (IEC G-500)?

Borofloat 33 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while Lead Glass (IEC G-500) is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

When should I choose Borofloat 33 over Lead Glass (IEC G-500)?

Pick Borofloat 33 when surface hardness matters, or when weight is the constraint. Pick Lead Glass (IEC G-500) when strength drives the design.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Borofloat 33 and Lead Glass (IEC G-500) side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.