FabDigitFabDigit

Alumina-Lime-Silica Glass (IEC G-400) vs Soda-Lime Glass

Glass · grade comparison

Alumina-Lime-Silica Glass (IEC G-400) and Soda-Lime Glass are both glass grades. Alumina-Lime-Silica Glass (IEC G-400) is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 60 MPa (8.7 ksi) against 45 MPa (6.53 ksi) for Soda-Lime Glass, about 33% more. Alumina-Lime-Silica Glass (IEC G-400) is harder — 620 HV against 550 HV for Soda-Lime Glass — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. Soda-Lime Glass is lighter (2.5 g/cm³ vs 2.6 g/cm³ for Alumina-Lime-Silica Glass (IEC G-400)) and Alumina-Lime-Silica Glass (IEC G-400) is stiffer (87 GPa vs 72 GPa). On the shop floor, Soda-Lime Glass sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than Alumina-Lime-Silica Glass (IEC G-400) (premium, $$$).

Alumina-Lime-Silica Glass (IEC G-400)Choose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

Soda-Lime GlassChoose it when weight is the constraint, or when cost is the deciding factor.

Alumina-Lime-Silica Glass (IEC G-400) vs Soda-Lime Glass: properties

Alumina-Lime-Silica Glass (IEC G-400)Soda-Lime Glass

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

87 GPa12.6 Msi
72 GPa10.4 Msi

Shear Modulus

35 GPa5.1 Msi
29.5 GPa4.3 Msi

Bulk Modulus

57 GPa8.3 Msi
43 GPa6.2 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.25
0.22

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

60 MPa8.7 ksi
45 MPa6.5 ksi

Compressive Strength

1,000 MPa145 ksi
900 MPa131 ksi

Flexural Strength

90 MPa13.1 ksi
45 MPa6.5 ksi

Shear Strength

55 MPa8 ksi
—

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

0.8 MPa·√m0.73 ksi·√in
0.75 MPa·√m0.68 ksi·√in

Hardness, Vickers

620 HV
550 HV

Hardness, Knoop

600 HK
480 HK

Hardness, Mohs

6.5
5.5

Same in both: Elongation at Break 0%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.6 g/cm³0.09 lb/in³
2.5 g/cm³0.09 lb/in³

Refractive Index

1.53
1.52

Same in both: Light Transmission 90% · Porosity 0%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

1.2 W/m·K0.69 BTU/hr·ft·°F
1 W/m·K0.58 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

4.6 µm/m·K2.6 µin/in·°F
9 µm/m·K5 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

650°C1,202 °F
110°C230 °F

Min Service Temperature

-190°C-310 °F
-70°C-94 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 840 J/kg·K0.2 BTU/lb·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in
1×10¹⁰ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁷ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

30 kV/mm762 V/mil
12 kV/mm305 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

6.3
7.2

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.004
0.009

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm
1×10¹² Ω·cm

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

90 / 100
85 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

12 / 100
20 / 100

Polishability

96 / 100
95 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

25 MJ/kg10,748 BTU/lb
15 MJ/kg6,449 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

1.6 kg CO₂/kg
1.2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

15 L/kg1.8 gal/lb
14 L/kg1.7 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

5%
22%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

23 kN·m/kg
18 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

33.5 MN·m/kg
28.8 MN·m/kg

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.5 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every glass grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005002.533.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityAlumina-Lime-Silica Glass (IEC G-400)Soda-Lime Glass
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$ Budget
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Alumina-Lime-Silica Glass (IEC G-400) vs Soda-Lime Glass — frequently asked

Is Alumina-Lime-Silica Glass (IEC G-400) stronger than Soda-Lime Glass?

Yes. Alumina-Lime-Silica Glass (IEC G-400) has a typical tensile strength of 60 MPa (8.7 ksi) against 45 MPa (6.53 ksi) for Soda-Lime Glass — about 33% more.

Which is cheaper, Alumina-Lime-Silica Glass (IEC G-400) or Soda-Lime Glass?

Soda-Lime Glass is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while Alumina-Lime-Silica Glass (IEC G-400) is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, Alumina-Lime-Silica Glass (IEC G-400) or Soda-Lime Glass?

Soda-Lime Glass. Its machinability rates poor (20/100) against not recommended (12/100) for Alumina-Lime-Silica Glass (IEC G-400).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Alumina-Lime-Silica Glass (IEC G-400) and Soda-Lime Glass side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.