FabDigitFabDigit

Alumina-Lime-Silica Glass (IEC G-400) vs Baria-Alkali-Silica Glass (IEC G-600)

Glass · grade comparison

Alumina-Lime-Silica Glass (IEC G-400) and Baria-Alkali-Silica Glass (IEC G-600) are both glass grades. Alumina-Lime-Silica Glass (IEC G-400) is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 60 MPa (8.7 ksi) against 45 MPa (6.53 ksi) for Baria-Alkali-Silica Glass (IEC G-600), about 33% more. Alumina-Lime-Silica Glass (IEC G-400) is harder — 620 HV against 540 HV for Baria-Alkali-Silica Glass (IEC G-600) — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. Alumina-Lime-Silica Glass (IEC G-400) is lighter (2.6 g/cm³ vs 2.82 g/cm³ for Baria-Alkali-Silica Glass (IEC G-600)) and Alumina-Lime-Silica Glass (IEC G-400) is stiffer (87 GPa vs 72 GPa).

Alumina-Lime-Silica Glass (IEC G-400)Choose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

Alumina-Lime-Silica Glass (IEC G-400) vs Baria-Alkali-Silica Glass (IEC G-600): properties

Alumina-Lime-Silica Glass (IEC G-400)Baria-Alkali-Silica Glass (IEC G-600)

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

87 GPa12.6 Msi
72 GPa10.4 Msi

Shear Modulus

35 GPa5.1 Msi
29 GPa4.2 Msi

Bulk Modulus

57 GPa8.3 Msi
43 GPa6.2 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.25
0.22

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

60 MPa8.7 ksi
45 MPa6.5 ksi

Compressive Strength

1,000 MPa145 ksi
900 MPa131 ksi

Flexural Strength

90 MPa13.1 ksi
70 MPa10.2 ksi

Shear Strength

55 MPa8 ksi
35 MPa5.1 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

0.8 MPa·√m0.73 ksi·√in
0.72 MPa·√m0.66 ksi·√in

Hardness, Vickers

620 HV
540 HV

Hardness, Knoop

600 HK
470 HK

Hardness, Mohs

6.5
5.8

Same in both: Elongation at Break 0%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.6 g/cm³0.09 lb/in³
2.82 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Refractive Index

1.53
1.56

Same in both: Light Transmission 90% · Porosity 0%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

1.2 W/m·K0.69 BTU/hr·ft·°F
1 W/m·K0.58 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

840 J/kg·K0.2 BTU/lb·°F
790 J/kg·K0.19 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

4.6 µm/m·K2.6 µin/in·°F
9.5 µm/m·K5.3 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

650°C1,202 °F
420°C788 °F

Min Service Temperature

-190°C-310 °F
-100°C-148 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in
1×10¹² Ω·m3.94×10¹⁹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

30 kV/mm762 V/mil
25 kV/mm635 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

6.3
7

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁴ Ω·cm

Same in both: Dissipation Factor (1 MHz) 0.004

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

90 / 100
80 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

12 / 100
8 / 100

Polishability

96 / 100
92 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

25 MJ/kg10,748 BTU/lb
16 MJ/kg6,879 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

1.6 kg CO₂/kg
1.3 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

5%
15%

Same in both: Embodied Water 15 L/kg1.8 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

23 kN·m/kg
16 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

33.5 MN·m/kg
25.5 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

0.5 mm²/s
0.4 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every glass grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005002.533.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityAlumina-Lime-Silica Glass (IEC G-400)Baria-Alkali-Silica Glass (IEC G-600)
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Alumina-Lime-Silica Glass (IEC G-400) vs Baria-Alkali-Silica Glass (IEC G-600) — frequently asked

Is Alumina-Lime-Silica Glass (IEC G-400) stronger than Baria-Alkali-Silica Glass (IEC G-600)?

Yes. Alumina-Lime-Silica Glass (IEC G-400) has a typical tensile strength of 60 MPa (8.7 ksi) against 45 MPa (6.53 ksi) for Baria-Alkali-Silica Glass (IEC G-600) — about 33% more.

Which is cheaper, Alumina-Lime-Silica Glass (IEC G-400) or Baria-Alkali-Silica Glass (IEC G-600)?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$, premium); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

When should I choose Alumina-Lime-Silica Glass (IEC G-400) over Baria-Alkali-Silica Glass (IEC G-600)?

Pick Alumina-Lime-Silica Glass (IEC G-400) when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Alumina-Lime-Silica Glass (IEC G-400) and Baria-Alkali-Silica Glass (IEC G-600) side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.