FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy ERCuNi vs ERCuSi-A

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy ERCuNi and ERCuSi-A are both copper alloy grades. ERCuNi is the stronger of the two: yield strength 220 MPa (31.9 ksi) against 195 MPa (28.3 ksi) for ERCuSi-A, about 13% more; tensile strength follows at 400 MPa (58 ksi) vs 350 MPa (50.8 ksi). In exchange, ERCuSi-A is the more ductile: elongation 38% versus 32% for ERCuNi, and ERCuNi is harder (90 HB vs 85 HB). ERCuSi-A is lighter (8.53 g/cm³ vs 8.94 g/cm³ for ERCuNi) and ERCuNi is stiffer (152 GPa vs 103 GPa). On the shop floor, ERCuSi-A welds better (excellent vs very good).

ERCuNiChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

ERCuSi-AChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

ERCuNi vs ERCuSi-A: properties

ERCuNiERCuSi-A

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

152 GPa22 Msi
103 GPa14.9 Msi

Shear Modulus

57 GPa8.3 Msi
38.5 GPa5.6 Msi

Bulk Modulus

158 GPa22.9 Msi
115 GPa16.7 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.34
0.35

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

400 MPa58 ksi
350 MPa50.8 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

220 MPa31.9 ksi
195 MPa28.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

32%
38%

Shear Strength

260 MPa37.7 ksi
215 MPa31.2 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

130 MPa18.9 ksi
145 MPa21 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

90 J66.4 ft·lbf
60 J44.3 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

90 HB
85 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

52 HRB
45 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

95 HV
90 HV

Same in both: Reduction in Area 45%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.94 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
8.53 g/cm³0.31 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,170°C2,138 °F
970°C1,778 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,240°C2,264 °F
1,025°C1,877 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

28 W/m·K16.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F
36 W/m·K20.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F
380 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

16.2 µm/m·K9 µin/in·°F
18 µm/m·K10 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

210 J/g90.3 BTU/lb
205 J/g88.1 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

315°C599 °F
200°C392 °F

Min Service Temperature

-198°C-324 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

4.6 % IACS
7 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.75×10⁻⁷ Ω·m14.8 µΩ·in
2.46×10⁻⁷ Ω·m9.69 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.27 V
-0.26 V

Corrosion Resistance

74 / 100
72 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

28 / 100
33 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

20%
30%

Weldability

78 / 100
90 / 100

Formability (cold)

75 / 100
70 / 100

Castability

45 / 100
60 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

70 / 100
92 / 100

Polishability

72 / 100
75 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

78 MJ/kg33,534 BTU/lb
57 MJ/kg24,506 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

6.2 kg CO₂/kg
3.8 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

260 L/kg31.2 gal/lb
320 L/kg38.3 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

25%
40%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

45 kN·m/kg
41 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

17 MN·m/kg
12.1 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

159 kJ/m³
185 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

8.3 mm²/s
11.1 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

5
7

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleERCuSi-AERCuNi

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityERCuNiERCuSi-A
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

ERCuNi vs ERCuSi-A — frequently asked

Is ERCuNi stronger than ERCuSi-A?

Yes. ERCuNi has a typical yield strength of 220 MPa (31.9 ksi) against 195 MPa (28.3 ksi) for ERCuSi-A — about 13% more. Tensile strength is 400 MPa (58 ksi) vs 350 MPa (50.8 ksi).

Which is cheaper, ERCuNi or ERCuSi-A?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, ERCuNi or ERCuSi-A?

ERCuSi-A, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 33/100 against 28/100 for ERCuNi; for welding the order is ERCuSi-A first (excellent, 90/100) then ERCuNi (very good, 78/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in ERCuNi and ERCuSi-A side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.