FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy CC490K vs CC765S

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy CC490K and CC765S are both copper alloy grades. CC765S is the stronger of the two: yield strength 230 MPa (33.4 ksi) against 100 MPa (14.5 ksi) for CC490K, about 130% more; tensile strength follows at 480 MPa (69.6 ksi) vs 215 MPa (31.2 ksi). CC765S is harder — 120 HB against 65 HB for CC490K — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. CC765S is lighter (8 g/cm³ vs 8.7 g/cm³ for CC490K) and CC765S is stiffer (100 GPa vs 90 GPa). On the shop floor, CC490K machines more easily (very good vs fair), CC765S welds better (fair vs poor), and CC765S forms better (poor vs not recommended).

CC490KChoose it when the part is machined in volume.

CC765SChoose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

CC490K vs CC765S: properties

CC490KCC765S

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

90 GPa13.1 Msi
100 GPa14.5 Msi

Shear Modulus

36 GPa5.2 Msi
38 GPa5.5 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

215 MPa31.2 ksi
480 MPa69.6 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

100 MPa14.5 ksi
230 MPa33.4 ksi

Elongation at Break

20%
22%

Shear Strength

160 MPa23.2 ksi
300 MPa43.5 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

75 MPa10.9 ksi
170 MPa24.7 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

65 HB
120 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

25 HRB
68 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

68 HV
126 HV

Compressive Strength

—
520 MPa75.4 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
35 MPa·√m31.9 ksi·√in

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 105 GPa15.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.34 · Reduction in Area 20% · Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT) 25 J18.4 ft·lbf

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.7 g/cm³0.31 lb/in³
8 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

900°C1,652 °F
880°C1,616 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,000°C1,832 °F
915°C1,679 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

78 W/m·K45.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
60 W/m·K34.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F
380 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

18.5 µm/m·K10.3 µin/in·°F
20.5 µm/m·K11.4 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

205 J/g88.1 BTU/lb
170 J/g73.1 BTU/lb

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 200°C392 °F · Min Service Temperature -100°C-148 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

15 % IACS
13 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.15×10⁻⁷ Ω·m4.53 µΩ·in
1.33×10⁻⁷ Ω·m5.24 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.25 V
-0.28 V

Corrosion Resistance

70 / 100
55 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

80 / 100
45 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

80%
90%

Weldability

25 / 100
40 / 100

Formability (cold)

10 / 100
20 / 100

Castability

85 / 100
80 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

75 / 100
45 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Water

260 L/kg31.2 gal/lb
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

85%
75%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 3.6 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

25 kN·m/kg
60 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

10.3 MN·m/kg
12.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

56 kJ/m³
265 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

23.8 mm²/s
19.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

10
14

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleCC490KCC765S

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityCC490KCC765S
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

CC490K vs CC765S — frequently asked

Is CC765S stronger than CC490K?

Yes. CC765S has a typical yield strength of 230 MPa (33.4 ksi) against 100 MPa (14.5 ksi) for CC490K — about 130% more. Tensile strength is 480 MPa (69.6 ksi) vs 215 MPa (31.2 ksi).

Which is cheaper, CC490K or CC765S?

CC765S is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while CC490K is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, CC490K or CC765S?

CC490K. Its machinability rates very good (80/100) against fair (45/100) for CC765S; for welding the order is CC765S first (fair, 40/100) then CC490K (poor, 25/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in CC490K and CC765S side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.