FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C84000 vs CC490K

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C84000 and CC490K are both copper alloy grades. C84000 is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 234 MPa (33.9 ksi) against 215 MPa (31.2 ksi) for CC490K, about 9% more. C84000 is the more ductile: elongation 26% versus 20% for CC490K, and CC490K is harder (65 HB vs 55 HB). On the shop floor, C84000 machines more easily (excellent vs very good) and C84000 sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than CC490K (high, $$$$).

C84000Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

C84000 vs CC490K: properties

C84000CC490K

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Shear Modulus

34 GPa4.9 Msi
36 GPa5.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

234 MPa33.9 ksi
215 MPa31.2 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

97 MPa14.1 ksi
100 MPa14.5 ksi

Elongation at Break

26%
20%

Compressive Strength

275 MPa39.9 ksi
—

Shear Strength

185 MPa26.8 ksi
160 MPa23.2 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

76 MPa11 ksi
75 MPa10.9 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

20 J14.8 ft·lbf
25 J18.4 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

55 HB
65 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

20 HRB
25 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

58 HV
68 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 90 GPa13.1 Msi · Bulk Modulus 105 GPa15.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.34 · Reduction in Area 20%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.55 g/cm³0.31 lb/in³
8.7 g/cm³0.31 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

845°C1,553 °F
900°C1,652 °F

Same in both: Liquidus Temperature 1,000°C1,832 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

72 W/m·K41.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F
78 W/m·K45.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

20 µm/m·K11.1 µin/in·°F
18.5 µm/m·K10.3 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

170 J/g73.1 BTU/lb
205 J/g88.1 BTU/lb

Min Service Temperature

-200°C-328 °F
-100°C-148 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 200°C392 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

16.4 % IACS
15 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.05×10⁻⁷ Ω·m4.13 µΩ·in
1.15×10⁻⁷ Ω·m4.53 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

55 / 100
70 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.25 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

90 / 100
80 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

90%
80%

Weldability

20 / 100
25 / 100

Formability (cold)

30 / 100
10 / 100

Castability

90 / 100
85 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

80 / 100
75 / 100

Same in both: Polishability 60 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.4 kg CO₂/kg
3.6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

220 L/kg26.4 gal/lb
260 L/kg31.2 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb · Typical Recycled Content 85%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

27 kN·m/kg
25 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

10.5 MN·m/kg
10.3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

52 kJ/m³
56 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

22.3 mm²/s
23.8 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

9
10

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleCC490KC84000

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC84000CC490K
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C84000 vs CC490K — frequently asked

Is C84000 stronger than CC490K?

Yes. C84000 has a typical tensile strength of 234 MPa (33.9 ksi) against 215 MPa (31.2 ksi) for CC490K — about 9% more.

Which is cheaper, C84000 or CC490K?

C84000 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while CC490K is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, C84000 or CC490K?

C84000. Its machinability rates excellent (90/100) against very good (80/100) for CC490K; for welding the order is CC490K first (poor, 25/100) then C84000 (poor, 20/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C84000 and CC490K side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.