FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C83600 vs CC490K

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C83600 and CC490K are both copper alloy grades. C83600 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 117 MPa (17 ksi) against 100 MPa (14.5 ksi) for CC490K, about 17% more; tensile strength follows at 255 MPa (37 ksi) vs 215 MPa (31.2 ksi). C83600 is the more ductile: elongation 30% versus 20% for CC490K, and CC490K is harder (65 HB vs 60 HB). CC490K is stiffer (90 GPa vs 83 GPa).

C83600Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

C83600 vs CC490K: properties

C83600CC490K

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

83 GPa12 Msi
90 GPa13.1 Msi

Shear Modulus

31 GPa4.5 Msi
36 GPa5.2 Msi

Bulk Modulus

100 GPa14.5 Msi
105 GPa15.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

255 MPa37 ksi
215 MPa31.2 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

117 MPa17 ksi
100 MPa14.5 ksi

Elongation at Break

30%
20%

Compressive Strength

240 MPa34.8 ksi
—

Shear Strength

207 MPa30 ksi
160 MPa23.2 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

83 MPa12 ksi
75 MPa10.9 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

14 J10.3 ft·lbf
25 J18.4 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

60 HB
65 HB

Reduction in Area

—
20%

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
25 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

—
68 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.34

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.83 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
8.7 g/cm³0.31 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

854°C1,569 °F
900°C1,652 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,010°C1,850 °F
1,000°C1,832 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

72 W/m·K41.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F
78 W/m·K45.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

18 µm/m·K10 µin/in·°F
18.5 µm/m·K10.3 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

185 J/g79.5 BTU/lb
205 J/g88.1 BTU/lb

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 200°C392 °F · Min Service Temperature -100°C-148 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 15 % IACS · Electrical Resistivity 1.15×10⁻⁷ Ω·m4.53 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

60 / 100
70 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.25 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

84 / 100
80 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

210%
80%

Weldability

20 / 100
25 / 100

Castability

92 / 100
85 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

82 / 100
75 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
60 / 100

Formability (cold)

—
10 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

50 MJ/kg21,496 BTU/lb
55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb

Embodied Water

280 L/kg33.6 gal/lb
260 L/kg31.2 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 3.6 kg CO₂/kg · Typical Recycled Content 85%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

29 kN·m/kg
25 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

9.4 MN·m/kg
10.3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

82 kJ/m³
56 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

21.6 mm²/s
23.8 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

12
10

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleCC490KC83600

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC83600CC490K
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C83600 vs CC490K — frequently asked

Is C83600 stronger than CC490K?

Yes. C83600 has a typical yield strength of 117 MPa (17 ksi) against 100 MPa (14.5 ksi) for CC490K — about 17% more. Tensile strength is 255 MPa (37 ksi) vs 215 MPa (31.2 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C83600 or CC490K?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, C83600 or CC490K?

CC490K. Its weldability rates poor (25/100) against poor (20/100) for C83600.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C83600 and CC490K side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.