FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C83300 vs CC490K

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C83300 and CC490K are both copper alloy grades. CC490K is the stronger of the two: yield strength 100 MPa (14.5 ksi) against 69 MPa (10 ksi) for C83300, about 45% more. In exchange, C83300 is the more ductile: elongation 35% versus 20% for CC490K, and CC490K is harder (65 HB vs 35 HB). C83300 is stiffer (96.5 GPa vs 90 GPa) and C83300 conducts heat better (145 W/m·K vs 78 W/m·K).

C83300Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

CC490KChoose it when strength drives the design.

C83300 vs CC490K: properties

C83300CC490K

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

96.5 GPa14 Msi
90 GPa13.1 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

234 MPa33.9 ksi
215 MPa31.2 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

69 MPa10 ksi
100 MPa14.5 ksi

Elongation at Break

35%
20%

Reduction in Area

30%
20%

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

70 MPa10.2 ksi
75 MPa10.9 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

35 J25.8 ft·lbf
25 J18.4 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

35 HB
65 HB

Hardness, Vickers

40 HV
68 HV

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
25 HRB

Same in both: Shear Modulus 36 GPa5.2 Msi · Bulk Modulus 105 GPa15.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.34 · Shear Strength 160 MPa23.2 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.8 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
8.7 g/cm³0.31 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,010°C1,850 °F
900°C1,652 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,055°C1,931 °F
1,000°C1,832 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

145 W/m·K83.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F
78 W/m·K45.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

18 µm/m·K10 µin/in·°F
18.5 µm/m·K10.3 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

200 J/g86 BTU/lb
205 J/g88.1 BTU/lb

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-100°C-148 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 200°C392 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

32 % IACS
15 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.13 µΩ·in
1.15×10⁻⁷ Ω·m4.53 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

62 / 100
70 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.25 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

85 / 100
80 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

84%
80%

Weldability

30 / 100
25 / 100

Formability (cold)

25 / 100
10 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

90 / 100
75 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
60 / 100

Same in both: Castability 85 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

48 MJ/kg20,636 BTU/lb
55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.2 kg CO₂/kg
3.6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

250 L/kg30 gal/lb
260 L/kg31.2 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

88%
85%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

27 kN·m/kg
25 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

11 MN·m/kg
10.3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

25 kJ/m³
56 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

43.7 mm²/s
23.8 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

20
10

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleCC490KC83300

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC83300CC490K
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C83300 vs CC490K — frequently asked

Is CC490K stronger than C83300?

Yes. CC490K has a typical yield strength of 100 MPa (14.5 ksi) against 69 MPa (10 ksi) for C83300 — about 45% more. Tensile strength is 215 MPa (31.2 ksi) vs 234 MPa (33.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C83300 or CC490K?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, C83300 or CC490K?

C83300. Its machinability rates excellent (85/100) against very good (80/100) for CC490K; for welding the order is C83300 first (poor, 30/100) then CC490K (poor, 25/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C83300 and CC490K side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.