FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy CC490K vs CC750S

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy CC490K and CC750S are both copper alloy grades. CC490K is the stronger of the two: yield strength 100 MPa (14.5 ksi) against 90 MPa (13.1 ksi) for CC750S, about 11% more. CC490K is the more ductile: elongation 20% versus 18% for CC750S, and CC490K is harder (65 HB vs 55 HB). CC750S is stiffer (95 GPa vs 90 GPa) and CC750S conducts heat better (115 W/m·K vs 78 W/m·K). On the shop floor, CC750S sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than CC490K (high, $$$$).

CC490KChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

CC750SChoose it when cost is the deciding factor.

CC490K vs CC750S: properties

CC490KCC750S

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

90 GPa13.1 Msi
95 GPa13.8 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

215 MPa31.2 ksi
210 MPa30.5 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

100 MPa14.5 ksi
90 MPa13.1 ksi

Elongation at Break

20%
18%

Shear Strength

160 MPa23.2 ksi
155 MPa22.5 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

75 MPa10.9 ksi
65 MPa9.4 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

25 J18.4 ft·lbf
20 J14.8 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

65 HB
55 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

25 HRB
18 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

68 HV
58 HV

Compressive Strength

—
230 MPa33.4 ksi

Same in both: Shear Modulus 36 GPa5.2 Msi · Bulk Modulus 105 GPa15.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.34 · Reduction in Area 20%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.7 g/cm³0.31 lb/in³
8.5 g/cm³0.31 lb/in³

Liquidus Temperature

1,000°C1,832 °F
935°C1,715 °F

Same in both: Melting Point (Solidus) 900°C1,652 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

78 W/m·K45.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
115 W/m·K66.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F
380 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

18.5 µm/m·K10.3 µin/in·°F
20.5 µm/m·K11.4 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

205 J/g88.1 BTU/lb
170 J/g73.1 BTU/lb

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 200°C392 °F · Min Service Temperature -100°C-148 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

15 % IACS
26 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.15×10⁻⁷ Ω·m4.53 µΩ·in
6.6×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.6 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.25 V
-0.26 V

Corrosion Resistance

70 / 100
50 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

80 / 100
85 / 100

Weldability

25 / 100
20 / 100

Formability (cold)

10 / 100
20 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
75 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 80% · Castability 85 / 100 · Brazeability / Solderability 75 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb
45 MJ/kg19,347 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.6 kg CO₂/kg
3.2 kg CO₂/kg

Same in both: Embodied Water 260 L/kg31.2 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 85%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

10.3 MN·m/kg
11.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

56 kJ/m³
43 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

23.8 mm²/s
35.6 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

10
12

Same in both: Specific Strength (UTS / density) 25 kN·m/kg

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleCC490KCC750S

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityCC490KCC750S
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

CC490K vs CC750S — frequently asked

Is CC490K stronger than CC750S?

Yes. CC490K has a typical yield strength of 100 MPa (14.5 ksi) against 90 MPa (13.1 ksi) for CC750S — about 11% more. Tensile strength is 215 MPa (31.2 ksi) vs 210 MPa (30.5 ksi).

Which is cheaper, CC490K or CC750S?

CC750S is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while CC490K is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, CC490K or CC750S?

CC750S. Its machinability rates excellent (85/100) against very good (80/100) for CC490K; for welding the order is CC490K first (poor, 25/100) then CC750S (poor, 20/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in CC490K and CC750S side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.