FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C99300 vs CC380H

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C99300 and CC380H are both copper alloy grades. C99300 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 420 MPa (60.9 ksi) against 140 MPa (20.3 ksi) for CC380H, about 3.0 times as much; tensile strength follows at 655 MPa (95 ksi) vs 300 MPa (43.5 ksi). In exchange, CC380H is the more ductile: elongation 25% versus 2.5% for C99300, and C99300 is harder (205 HB vs 80 HB). C99300 is lighter (7.5 g/cm³ vs 8.9 g/cm³ for CC380H) and CC380H conducts heat better (42 W/m·K vs 30 W/m·K). On the shop floor, CC380H welds better (very good vs fair).

C99300Choose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

CC380HChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when it will be welded.

C99300 vs CC380H: properties

C99300CC380H

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

120 GPa17.4 Msi
124 GPa18 Msi

Shear Modulus

45 GPa6.5 Msi
46 GPa6.7 Msi

Bulk Modulus

120 GPa17.4 Msi
128 GPa18.6 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.32
0.33

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

655 MPa95 ksi
300 MPa43.5 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

420 MPa60.9 ksi
140 MPa20.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

2.5%
25%

Reduction in Area

4%
25%

Compressive Strength

900 MPa131 ksi
—

Shear Strength

430 MPa62.4 ksi
195 MPa28.3 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

240 MPa34.8 ksi
105 MPa15.2 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

7 J5.2 ft·lbf
50 J36.9 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

205 HB
80 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

94 HRB
40 HRB

Hardness, Rockwell C

20 HRC
—

Hardness, Vickers

215 HV
84 HV

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.5 g/cm³0.27 lb/in³
8.9 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,075°C1,967 °F
1,100°C2,012 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,100°C2,012 °F
1,145°C2,093 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

30 W/m·K17.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F
42 W/m·K24.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

420 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F
377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

16 µm/m·K8.9 µin/in·°F
16.5 µm/m·K9.2 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

220 J/g94.6 BTU/lb
200 J/g86 BTU/lb

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 300°C572 °F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

6 % IACS
10 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.9×10⁻⁷ Ω·m11.4 µΩ·in
1.7×10⁻⁷ Ω·m6.69 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.26 V
-0.28 V

Corrosion Resistance

75 / 100
82 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

25 / 100
28 / 100

Weldability

40 / 100
80 / 100

Formability (cold)

5 / 100
15 / 100

Castability

65 / 100
60 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

30 / 100
70 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 20% · Polishability 70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

75 MJ/kg32,244 BTU/lb
70 MJ/kg30,095 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.6 kg CO₂/kg
5.2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

320 L/kg38.3 gal/lb
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 40%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

87 kN·m/kg
34 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

16 MN·m/kg
13.9 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

735 kJ/m³
79 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

9.5 mm²/s
12.5 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

10
6

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleCC380HC99300

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC99300CC380H
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C99300 vs CC380H — frequently asked

Is C99300 stronger than CC380H?

Yes. C99300 has a typical yield strength of 420 MPa (60.9 ksi) against 140 MPa (20.3 ksi) for CC380H — about 3.0 times as much. Tensile strength is 655 MPa (95 ksi) vs 300 MPa (43.5 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C99300 or CC380H?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, C99300 or CC380H?

CC380H. Its weldability rates very good (80/100) against fair (40/100) for C99300.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C99300 and CC380H side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.