FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C96900 vs CC380H

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C96900 and CC380H are both copper alloy grades. C96900 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 655 MPa (95 ksi) against 140 MPa (20.3 ksi) for CC380H, about 4.7 times as much; tensile strength follows at 795 MPa (115 ksi) vs 300 MPa (43.5 ksi). In exchange, CC380H is the more ductile: elongation 25% versus 8% for C96900, and C96900 is harder (275 HB vs 80 HB). C96900 is stiffer (138 GPa vs 124 GPa) and CC380H runs hotter in service (300°C vs 260°C continuous). On the shop floor, C96900 machines more easily (good vs poor) and CC380H welds better (very good vs poor).

C96900Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.

CC380HChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

C96900 vs CC380H: properties

C96900CC380H

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

138 GPa20 Msi
124 GPa18 Msi

Shear Modulus

52 GPa7.5 Msi
46 GPa6.7 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.32
0.33

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

795 MPa115 ksi
300 MPa43.5 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

655 MPa95 ksi
140 MPa20.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

8%
25%

Reduction in Area

12%
25%

Compressive Strength

700 MPa102 ksi
—

Shear Strength

480 MPa69.6 ksi
195 MPa28.3 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

240 MPa34.8 ksi
105 MPa15.2 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

14 J10.3 ft·lbf
50 J36.9 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

275 HB
80 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

28 HRC
—

Hardness, Vickers

290 HV
84 HV

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
40 HRB

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 128 GPa18.6 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.94 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
8.9 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,010°C1,850 °F
1,100°C2,012 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,120°C2,048 °F
1,145°C2,093 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

40 W/m·K23.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
42 W/m·K24.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

380 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F
377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

16.4 µm/m·K9.1 µin/in·°F
16.5 µm/m·K9.2 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

260°C500 °F
300°C572 °F

Latent Heat of Fusion

—
200 J/g86 BTU/lb

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

11 % IACS
10 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.57×10⁻⁷ Ω·m6.18 µΩ·in
1.7×10⁻⁷ Ω·m6.69 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.26 V
-0.28 V

Corrosion Resistance

78 / 100
82 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

58 / 100
28 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

40%
20%

Weldability

25 / 100
80 / 100

Castability

62 / 100
60 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

45 / 100
70 / 100

Polishability

80 / 100
70 / 100

Same in both: Formability (cold) 15 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

95 MJ/kg40,843 BTU/lb
70 MJ/kg30,095 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

6.5 kg CO₂/kg
5.2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

400 L/kg47.9 gal/lb
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

30%
40%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

89 kN·m/kg
34 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

15.4 MN·m/kg
13.9 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

1,554 kJ/m³
79 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

11.8 mm²/s
12.5 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

14
6

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleCC380HC96900

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC96900CC380H
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C96900 vs CC380H — frequently asked

Is C96900 stronger than CC380H?

Yes. C96900 has a typical yield strength of 655 MPa (95 ksi) against 140 MPa (20.3 ksi) for CC380H — about 4.7 times as much. Tensile strength is 795 MPa (115 ksi) vs 300 MPa (43.5 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C96900 or CC380H?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, C96900 or CC380H?

C96900. Its machinability rates good (58/100) against poor (28/100) for CC380H; for welding the order is CC380H first (very good, 80/100) then C96900 (poor, 25/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C96900 and CC380H side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.