Copper Alloy C96600 vs CC382H
Copper Alloy · grade comparison
Copper Alloy C96600 and CC382H are both copper alloy grades. C96600 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 585 MPa (84.8 ksi) against 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) for CC382H, about 113% more; tensile strength follows at 760 MPa (110 ksi) vs 470 MPa (68.2 ksi). In exchange, CC382H is the more ductile: elongation 20% versus 5% for C96600, and C96600 is harder (285 HB vs 130 HB). C96600 runs hotter in service (330°C vs 300°C continuous) and C96600 conducts heat better (42 W/m·K vs 26 W/m·K). On the shop floor, CC382H welds better (good vs fair).
C96600Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.
CC382HChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when it will be welded.
C96600 vs CC382H: propertiesHow to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all copper alloy grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
How to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all copper alloy grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
Mechanical
Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.
Poisson's Ratio
Tensile Strength (Ultimate)
Yield Strength (0.2% offset)
Elongation at Break
Shear Strength
Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)
Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)
Hardness, Brinell
Hardness, Rockwell C
Hardness, Vickers
Reduction in Area
Hardness, Rockwell B
Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 150 GPa21.8 Msi · Shear Modulus 57 GPa8.3 Msi · Bulk Modulus 132 GPa19.1 Msi
Physical
Density and transition temperatures.
Melting Point (Solidus)
Liquidus Temperature
Same in both: Density 8.8 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
Thermal
How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.
Thermal Conductivity
Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)
Latent Heat of Fusion
Max Service Temperature (continuous)
Min Service Temperature
Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 380 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F
Electrical
Conductivity and insulation.
Electrical Conductivity
Electrical Resistivity
Chemical & Environmental
Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).
Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)
Corrosion Resistance
Manufacturability
FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.
Machinability
Weldability
Castability
Brazeability / Solderability
Polishability
Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 20% · Formability (cold) 10 / 100
Sustainability
Primary-production footprint per kilogram.
Embodied Energy (primary production)
Embodied Carbon (primary production)
Embodied Water
Typical Recycled Content
Common Calculations
Ratios derived from the values above.
Specific Strength (UTS / density)
Modulus of Resilience
Thermal Diffusivity
Thermal Shock Resistance Index
Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 17 MN·m/kg
Strength versus weight
Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.
Manufacturing and finishing
| Capability | C96600 | CC382H |
|---|---|---|
| Default condition | — | — |
| Relative cost | $$$$ High | $$$$ High |
| Min. machined wall | — | — |
| Best machined surface | — | — |
Both take the same 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.
C96600 vs CC382H — frequently asked
Is C96600 stronger than CC382H?
Yes. C96600 has a typical yield strength of 585 MPa (84.8 ksi) against 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) for CC382H — about 113% more. Tensile strength is 760 MPa (110 ksi) vs 470 MPa (68.2 ksi).
Which is cheaper, C96600 or CC382H?
Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.
Which is easier to machine, C96600 or CC382H?
C96600, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 28/100 against 22/100 for CC382H; for welding the order is CC382H first (good, 65/100) then C96600 (fair, 35/100).
Ready to make it?
Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C96600 and CC382H side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.
Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.