FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C96600 vs C96800

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C96600 and C96800 are both copper alloy grades. C96800 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 655 MPa (95 ksi) against 585 MPa (84.8 ksi) for C96600, about 12% more. C96800 is the more ductile: elongation 6% versus 5% for C96600. C96600 is stiffer (150 GPa vs 140 GPa) and C96600 runs hotter in service (330°C vs 260°C continuous). On the shop floor, C96800 machines more easily (good vs poor).

C96600Choose it when the part sees heat.

C96800Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

C96600 vs C96800: properties

C96600C96800

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

150 GPa21.8 Msi
140 GPa20.3 Msi

Shear Modulus

57 GPa8.3 Msi
53 GPa7.7 Msi

Bulk Modulus

132 GPa19.1 Msi
117 GPa17 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.32
0.31

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

760 MPa110 ksi
790 MPa115 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

585 MPa84.8 ksi
655 MPa95 ksi

Elongation at Break

5%
6%

Shear Strength

480 MPa69.6 ksi
470 MPa68.2 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

240 MPa34.8 ksi
270 MPa39.2 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

11 J8.1 ft·lbf
14 J10.3 ft·lbf

Reduction in Area

—
10%

Compressive Strength

—
700 MPa102 ksi

Same in both: Hardness, Brinell 285 HB · Hardness, Rockwell C 30 HRC · Hardness, Vickers 300 HV

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.8 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
8.9 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,170°C2,138 °F
1,030°C1,886 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,235°C2,255 °F
1,100°C2,012 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

42 W/m·K24.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F
35 W/m·K20.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

16 µm/m·K8.9 µin/in·°F
16.5 µm/m·K9.2 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

330°C626 °F
260°C500 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 380 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 210 J/g90.3 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

6 % IACS
8 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.9×10⁻⁷ Ω·m11.4 µΩ·in
2.15×10⁻⁷ Ω·m8.46 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.26 V
-0.25 V

Corrosion Resistance

78 / 100
76 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

28 / 100
55 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

20%
50%

Weldability

35 / 100
30 / 100

Formability (cold)

10 / 100
25 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

50 / 100
65 / 100

Same in both: Castability 60 / 100 · Polishability 80 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

95 MJ/kg40,843 BTU/lb
72 MJ/kg30,954 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

7.5 kg CO₂/kg
5.2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb
320 L/kg38.3 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

30%
25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

86 kN·m/kg
89 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

17 MN·m/kg
15.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

1,141 kJ/m³
1,532 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

12.6 mm²/s
10.3 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

13
12

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC96600C96800

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC96600C96800
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C96600 vs C96800 — frequently asked

Is C96800 stronger than C96600?

Yes. C96800 has a typical yield strength of 655 MPa (95 ksi) against 585 MPa (84.8 ksi) for C96600 — about 12% more. Tensile strength is 790 MPa (115 ksi) vs 760 MPa (110 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C96600 or C96800?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, C96600 or C96800?

C96800. Its machinability rates good (55/100) against poor (28/100) for C96600; for welding the order is C96600 first (fair, 35/100) then C96800 (poor, 30/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C96600 and C96800 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.