FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C95500 vs ZCuAl9Mn2

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C95500 and ZCuAl9Mn2 are both copper alloy grades. C95500 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 300 MPa (43.5 ksi) against 165 MPa (23.9 ksi) for ZCuAl9Mn2, about 82% more; tensile strength follows at 700 MPa (102 ksi) vs 430 MPa (62.4 ksi). In exchange, ZCuAl9Mn2 is the more ductile: elongation 25% versus 8% for C95500, and C95500 is harder (192 HB vs 95 HB). ZCuAl9Mn2 conducts heat better (50 W/m·K vs 42 W/m·K). On the shop floor, ZCuAl9Mn2 welds better (very good vs good) and ZCuAl9Mn2 sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than C95500 (specialty, $$$$$).

C95500Choose it when strength drives the design.

ZCuAl9Mn2Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when it will be welded.

C95500 vs ZCuAl9Mn2: properties

C95500ZCuAl9Mn2

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

110 GPa16 Msi
105 GPa15.2 Msi

Shear Modulus

42 GPa6.1 Msi
41 GPa5.9 Msi

Bulk Modulus

102 GPa14.8 Msi
112 GPa16.2 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.32
0.33

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

700 MPa102 ksi
430 MPa62.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

300 MPa43.5 ksi
165 MPa23.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

8%
25%

Shear Strength

425 MPa61.6 ksi
255 MPa37 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

240 MPa34.8 ksi
145 MPa21 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

50 MPa·√m45.5 ksi·√in
45 MPa·√m41 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

20 J14.8 ft·lbf
38 J28 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

192 HB
95 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

92 HRB
55 HRB

Reduction in Area

—
22%

Compressive Strength

—
450 MPa65.3 ksi

Hardness, Vickers

—
100 HV

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.53 g/cm³0.27 lb/in³
7.6 g/cm³0.27 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,054°C1,929 °F
1,040°C1,904 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,064°C1,947 °F
1,060°C1,940 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

42 W/m·K24.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F
50 W/m·K28.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

419 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F
400 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

16.2 µm/m·K9 µin/in·°F
16.8 µm/m·K9.3 µin/in·°F

Min Service Temperature

-100°C-148 °F
-200°C-328 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 210 J/g90.3 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 300°C572 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

8.5 % IACS
13 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.03×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.99 µΩ·in
1.33×10⁻⁷ Ω·m5.24 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.28 V
-0.29 V

Corrosion Resistance

80 / 100
70 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

50%
35%

Weldability

60 / 100
70 / 100

Formability (cold)

15 / 100
25 / 100

Castability

75 / 100
65 / 100

Same in both: Machinability 40 / 100 · Brazeability / Solderability 30 / 100 · Polishability 70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

60 MJ/kg25,795 BTU/lb
55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.2 kg CO₂/kg
3.8 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

40%
65%

Same in both: Embodied Water 250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

93 kN·m/kg
57 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

14.6 MN·m/kg
13.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

409 kJ/m³
130 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

13.3 mm²/s
16.4 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

16
12

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC95500ZCuAl9Mn2

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC95500ZCuAl9Mn2
CNC machiningYes—
Default conditionAs Cast—
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
Chrome PlatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Tin PlatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C95500 vs ZCuAl9Mn2 — frequently asked

Is C95500 stronger than ZCuAl9Mn2?

Yes. C95500 has a typical yield strength of 300 MPa (43.5 ksi) against 165 MPa (23.9 ksi) for ZCuAl9Mn2 — about 82% more. Tensile strength is 700 MPa (102 ksi) vs 430 MPa (62.4 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C95500 or ZCuAl9Mn2?

ZCuAl9Mn2 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while C95500 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, C95500 or ZCuAl9Mn2?

ZCuAl9Mn2. Its weldability rates very good (70/100) against good (60/100) for C95500.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C95500 and ZCuAl9Mn2 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.