FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C95500 vs ZCuAl8Mn13Fe3Ni2

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C95500 and ZCuAl8Mn13Fe3Ni2 are both copper alloy grades. ZCuAl8Mn13Fe3Ni2 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 320 MPa (46.4 ksi) against 300 MPa (43.5 ksi) for C95500, about 7% more. ZCuAl8Mn13Fe3Ni2 is the more ductile: elongation 22% versus 8% for C95500, and C95500 is harder (192 HB vs 180 HB). ZCuAl8Mn13Fe3Ni2 is stiffer (120 GPa vs 110 GPa) and C95500 conducts heat better (42 W/m·K vs 12 W/m·K). On the shop floor, ZCuAl8Mn13Fe3Ni2 sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than C95500 (specialty, $$$$$).

ZCuAl8Mn13Fe3Ni2Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

C95500 vs ZCuAl8Mn13Fe3Ni2: properties

C95500ZCuAl8Mn13Fe3Ni2

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

110 GPa16 Msi
120 GPa17.4 Msi

Shear Modulus

42 GPa6.1 Msi
45 GPa6.5 Msi

Bulk Modulus

102 GPa14.8 Msi
111 GPa16.1 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

700 MPa102 ksi
690 MPa100 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

300 MPa43.5 ksi
320 MPa46.4 ksi

Elongation at Break

8%
22%

Shear Strength

425 MPa61.6 ksi
420 MPa60.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

240 MPa34.8 ksi
250 MPa36.3 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

20 J14.8 ft·lbf
35 J25.8 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

192 HB
180 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

92 HRB
88 HRB

Reduction in Area

—
25%

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
10 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

—
189 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.32 · Fracture Toughness (K_IC) 50 MPa·√m45.5 ksi·√in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,054°C1,929 °F
870°C1,598 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,064°C1,947 °F
900°C1,652 °F

Same in both: Density 7.53 g/cm³0.27 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

42 W/m·K24.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F
12 W/m·K6.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

210 J/g90.3 BTU/lb
—

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 419 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 16.2 µm/m·K9 µin/in·°F · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 300°C572 °F · Min Service Temperature -100°C-148 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

8.5 % IACS
3 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.03×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.99 µΩ·in
5.7×10⁻⁷ Ω·m22.4 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

80 / 100
75 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.28 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

40 / 100
45 / 100

Formability (cold)

15 / 100
20 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

30 / 100
25 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 50% · Weldability 60 / 100 · Castability 75 / 100 · Polishability 70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

60 MJ/kg25,795 BTU/lb
50 MJ/kg21,496 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.2 kg CO₂/kg
3.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

250 L/kg30 gal/lb
280 L/kg33.6 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

40%
35%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

93 kN·m/kg
92 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

14.6 MN·m/kg
15.9 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

409 kJ/m³
427 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

13.3 mm²/s
3.8 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

16
4

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC95500ZCuAl8Mn13Fe3Ni2

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC95500ZCuAl8Mn13Fe3Ni2
CNC machiningYes—
Default conditionAs Cast—
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
Chrome PlatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Tin PlatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C95500 vs ZCuAl8Mn13Fe3Ni2 — frequently asked

Is ZCuAl8Mn13Fe3Ni2 stronger than C95500?

Yes. ZCuAl8Mn13Fe3Ni2 has a typical yield strength of 320 MPa (46.4 ksi) against 300 MPa (43.5 ksi) for C95500 — about 7% more. Tensile strength is 690 MPa (100 ksi) vs 700 MPa (102 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C95500 or ZCuAl8Mn13Fe3Ni2?

ZCuAl8Mn13Fe3Ni2 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while C95500 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, C95500 or ZCuAl8Mn13Fe3Ni2?

ZCuAl8Mn13Fe3Ni2, by a small margin. Both rate fair for machinability — 45/100 against 40/100 for C95500.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C95500 and ZCuAl8Mn13Fe3Ni2 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.