FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C95500 vs CC334G

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C95500 and CC334G are both copper alloy grades. CC334G is the stronger of the two: yield strength 450 MPa (65.3 ksi) against 300 MPa (43.5 ksi) for C95500, about 50% more. In exchange, C95500 is the more ductile: elongation 8% versus 6% for CC334G, and CC334G is harder (250 HB vs 192 HB). CC334G is stiffer (122 GPa vs 110 GPa) and C95500 conducts electricity better (8.5 % IACS vs 7 % IACS). On the shop floor, C95500 machines more easily (fair vs poor), C95500 welds better (good vs fair), and CC334G sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than C95500 (specialty, $$$$$).

C95500Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

CC334GChoose it when strength drives the design, or when cost is the deciding factor.

C95500 vs CC334G: properties

C95500CC334G

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

110 GPa16 Msi
122 GPa17.7 Msi

Shear Modulus

42 GPa6.1 Msi
46 GPa6.7 Msi

Bulk Modulus

102 GPa14.8 Msi
113 GPa16.4 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

700 MPa102 ksi
710 MPa103 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

300 MPa43.5 ksi
450 MPa65.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

8%
6%

Shear Strength

425 MPa61.6 ksi
430 MPa62.4 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

50 MPa·√m45.5 ksi·√in
26 MPa·√m23.7 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

20 J14.8 ft·lbf
10 J7.4 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

192 HB
250 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

92 HRB
103 HRB

Reduction in Area

—
7%

Compressive Strength

—
1,000 MPa145 ksi

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
24 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

—
262 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.32 · Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit) 240 MPa34.8 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.53 g/cm³0.27 lb/in³
7.45 g/cm³0.27 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,054°C1,929 °F
1,030°C1,886 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,064°C1,947 °F
1,060°C1,940 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

42 W/m·K24.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F
38 W/m·K22 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

419 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F
420 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

16.2 µm/m·K9 µin/in·°F
16 µm/m·K8.9 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

210 J/g90.3 BTU/lb
220 J/g94.6 BTU/lb

Min Service Temperature

-100°C-148 °F
-200°C-328 °F

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 300°C572 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

8.5 % IACS
7 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.03×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.99 µΩ·in
2.46×10⁻⁷ Ω·m9.69 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.28 V
-0.27 V

Corrosion Resistance

80 / 100
78 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

40 / 100
25 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

50%
20%

Weldability

60 / 100
40 / 100

Formability (cold)

15 / 100
5 / 100

Castability

75 / 100
65 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

30 / 100
20 / 100

Same in both: Polishability 70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

60 MJ/kg25,795 BTU/lb
55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.2 kg CO₂/kg
3.8 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

250 L/kg30 gal/lb
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

40%
45%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

93 kN·m/kg
95 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

14.6 MN·m/kg
16.4 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

409 kJ/m³
830 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

13.3 mm²/s
12.1 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

16
14

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC95500CC334G

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC95500CC334G
CNC machiningYes—
Default conditionAs Cast—
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
Chrome PlatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Tin PlatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C95500 vs CC334G — frequently asked

Is CC334G stronger than C95500?

Yes. CC334G has a typical yield strength of 450 MPa (65.3 ksi) against 300 MPa (43.5 ksi) for C95500 — about 50% more. Tensile strength is 710 MPa (103 ksi) vs 700 MPa (102 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C95500 or CC334G?

CC334G is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while C95500 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, C95500 or CC334G?

C95500. Its machinability rates fair (40/100) against poor (25/100) for CC334G; for welding the order is C95500 first (good, 60/100) then CC334G (fair, 40/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C95500 and CC334G side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.