FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C95500 vs CC333G

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C95500 and CC333G are both copper alloy grades. C95500 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 300 MPa (43.5 ksi) against 270 MPa (39.2 ksi) for CC333G, about 11% more; tensile strength follows at 700 MPa (102 ksi) vs 650 MPa (94.3 ksi). In exchange, CC333G is the more ductile: elongation 18% versus 8% for C95500, and C95500 is harder (192 HB vs 160 HB). CC333G is stiffer (117 GPa vs 110 GPa) and C95500 conducts electricity better (8.5 % IACS vs 7 % IACS). On the shop floor, CC333G welds better (very good vs good) and CC333G sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than C95500 (specialty, $$$$$).

C95500Choose it when strength drives the design.

CC333GChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when it will be welded.

C95500 vs CC333G: properties

C95500CC333G

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

110 GPa16 Msi
117 GPa17 Msi

Shear Modulus

42 GPa6.1 Msi
44 GPa6.4 Msi

Bulk Modulus

102 GPa14.8 Msi
108 GPa15.7 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

700 MPa102 ksi
650 MPa94.3 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

300 MPa43.5 ksi
270 MPa39.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

8%
18%

Shear Strength

425 MPa61.6 ksi
380 MPa55.1 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

240 MPa34.8 ksi
230 MPa33.4 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

50 MPa·√m45.5 ksi·√in
45 MPa·√m41 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

20 J14.8 ft·lbf
25 J18.4 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

192 HB
160 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

92 HRB
84 HRB

Reduction in Area

—
18%

Compressive Strength

—
700 MPa102 ksi

Hardness, Vickers

—
168 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.32

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.53 g/cm³0.27 lb/in³
7.6 g/cm³0.27 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,054°C1,929 °F
1,043°C1,909 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,064°C1,947 °F
1,060°C1,940 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Min Service Temperature

-100°C-148 °F
-200°C-328 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 42 W/m·K24.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Specific Heat Capacity 419 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 16.2 µm/m·K9 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 210 J/g90.3 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 300°C572 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

8.5 % IACS
7 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.03×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.99 µΩ·in
2.46×10⁻⁷ Ω·m9.69 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.28 V
-0.27 V

Corrosion Resistance

80 / 100
82 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

40 / 100
35 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

50%
30%

Weldability

60 / 100
70 / 100

Castability

75 / 100
70 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

30 / 100
20 / 100

Same in both: Formability (cold) 15 / 100 · Polishability 70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Water

250 L/kg30 gal/lb
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 60 MJ/kg25,795 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 4.2 kg CO₂/kg · Typical Recycled Content 40%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

93 kN·m/kg
86 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

14.6 MN·m/kg
15.4 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

409 kJ/m³
312 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

13.3 mm²/s
13.2 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

16
14

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC95500CC333G

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC95500CC333G
CNC machiningYes—
Default conditionAs Cast—
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
Chrome PlatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Tin PlatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C95500 vs CC333G — frequently asked

Is C95500 stronger than CC333G?

Yes. C95500 has a typical yield strength of 300 MPa (43.5 ksi) against 270 MPa (39.2 ksi) for CC333G — about 11% more. Tensile strength is 700 MPa (102 ksi) vs 650 MPa (94.3 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C95500 or CC333G?

CC333G is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while C95500 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, C95500 or CC333G?

C95500, by a small margin. Both rate fair for machinability — 40/100 against 35/100 for CC333G; for welding the order is CC333G first (very good, 70/100) then C95500 (good, 60/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C95500 and CC333G side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.