FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C95400 vs C95500

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C95400 and C95500 are both copper alloy grades. C95500 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 300 MPa (43.5 ksi) against 241 MPa (35 ksi) for C95400, about 24% more; tensile strength follows at 700 MPa (102 ksi) vs 586 MPa (85 ksi). In exchange, C95400 is the more ductile: elongation 12% versus 8% for C95500, and C95500 is harder (192 HB vs 170 HB). C95400 conducts heat better (58.6 W/m·K vs 42 W/m·K).

C95400Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

C95500Choose it when strength drives the design.

C95400 vs C95500: properties

C95400C95500

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Bulk Modulus

105 GPa15.2 Msi
102 GPa14.8 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.32
0.32

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

586 MPa85 ksi
700 MPa102 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

241 MPa35 ksi
300 MPa43.5 ksi

Elongation at Break

12%
8%

Shear Strength

380 MPa55.1 ksi
425 MPa61.6 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

193 MPa28 ksi
240 MPa34.8 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

170 HB
192 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

87 HRB
92 HRB

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
50 MPa·√m45.5 ksi·√in

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 110 GPa16 Msi · Shear Modulus 42 GPa6.1 Msi · Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT) 20 J14.8 ft·lbf

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.45 g/cm³0.27 lb/in³
7.53 g/cm³0.27 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,038°C1,900 °F
1,054°C1,929 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,054°C1,929 °F
1,064°C1,947 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

58.6 W/m·K33.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F
42 W/m·K24.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

418 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F
419 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

220 J/g94.6 BTU/lb
210 J/g90.3 BTU/lb

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-100°C-148 °F

Same in both: Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 16.2 µm/m·K9 µin/in·°F · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 300°C572 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

13 % IACS
8.5 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.33×10⁻⁷ Ω·m5.24 µΩ·in
2.03×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.99 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.31 V
-0.28 V

Corrosion Resistance

72 / 100
80 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

48 / 100
40 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

60%
50%

Formability (cold)

20 / 100
15 / 100

Castability

78 / 100
75 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

35 / 100
30 / 100

Same in both: Weldability 60 / 100 · Polishability 70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb
60 MJ/kg25,795 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.6 kg CO₂/kg
4.2 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

50%
40%

Same in both: Embodied Water 250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

79 kN·m/kg
93 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

14.8 MN·m/kg
14.6 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

264 kJ/m³
409 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

18.8 mm²/s
13.3 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

19
16

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC95500C95400

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC95400C95500
Default conditionAs CastAs Cast
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$$ Specialty
Min. machined wall0.8 mm0.8 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µmRa 1.6 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining. Both take the same 9 finishes: Chrome Plating, Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Gold Plating, Nickel Plating, Painting, Silver Plating, Tin Plating.

C95400 vs C95500 — frequently asked

Is C95500 stronger than C95400?

Yes. C95500 has a typical yield strength of 300 MPa (43.5 ksi) against 241 MPa (35 ksi) for C95400 — about 24% more. Tensile strength is 700 MPa (102 ksi) vs 586 MPa (85 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C95400 or C95500?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$$, specialty); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, C95400 or C95500?

C95400, by a small margin. Both rate fair for machinability — 48/100 against 40/100 for C95500.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C95400 and C95500 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.