FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C87200 vs C95500

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C87200 and C95500 are both copper alloy grades. C95500 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 300 MPa (43.5 ksi) against 165 MPa (23.9 ksi) for C87200, about 82% more; tensile strength follows at 700 MPa (102 ksi) vs 379 MPa (55 ksi). In exchange, C87200 is the more ductile: elongation 25% versus 8% for C95500, and C95500 is harder (192 HB vs 85 HB). C95500 is lighter (7.53 g/cm³ vs 8.3 g/cm³ for C87200) and C95500 is stiffer (110 GPa vs 103 GPa). On the shop floor, C87200 welds better (excellent vs good) and C87200 sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than C95500 (specialty, $$$$$).

C87200Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when it will be welded.

C95500Choose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

C87200 vs C95500: properties

C87200C95500

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

103 GPa14.9 Msi
110 GPa16 Msi

Shear Modulus

39 GPa5.7 Msi
42 GPa6.1 Msi

Bulk Modulus

105 GPa15.2 Msi
102 GPa14.8 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.33
0.32

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

379 MPa55 ksi
700 MPa102 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

165 MPa23.9 ksi
300 MPa43.5 ksi

Elongation at Break

25%
8%

Reduction in Area

22%
—

Shear Strength

240 MPa34.8 ksi
425 MPa61.6 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

130 MPa18.9 ksi
240 MPa34.8 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

30 J22.1 ft·lbf
20 J14.8 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

85 HB
192 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

55 HRB
92 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

90 HV
—

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
50 MPa·√m45.5 ksi·√in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.3 g/cm³0.3 lb/in³
7.53 g/cm³0.27 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

821°C1,510 °F
1,054°C1,929 °F

Liquidus Temperature

916°C1,681 °F
1,064°C1,947 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

28.5 W/m·K16.5 BTU/hr·ft·°F
42 W/m·K24.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

376 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F
419 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

18 µm/m·K10 µin/in·°F
16.2 µm/m·K9 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
300°C572 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-100°C-148 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 210 J/g90.3 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

6 % IACS
8.5 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.87×10⁻⁷ Ω·m11.3 µΩ·in
2.03×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.99 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.26 V
-0.28 V

Corrosion Resistance

72 / 100
80 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

40%
50%

Weldability

88 / 100
60 / 100

Castability

70 / 100
75 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

85 / 100
30 / 100

Polishability

75 / 100
70 / 100

Formability (cold)

—
15 / 100

Same in both: Machinability 40 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

57 MJ/kg24,506 BTU/lb
60 MJ/kg25,795 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.8 kg CO₂/kg
4.2 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

70%
40%

Same in both: Embodied Water 250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

46 kN·m/kg
93 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

12.4 MN·m/kg
14.6 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

132 kJ/m³
409 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

9.1 mm²/s
13.3 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

6
16

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC95500C87200

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC87200C95500
CNC machining—Yes
Default condition—As Cast
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$$ Specialty
Min. machined wall—0.8 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 1.6 µm
Chrome Plating—Yes
Electropolishing—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Tin Plating—Yes

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C87200 vs C95500 — frequently asked

Is C95500 stronger than C87200?

Yes. C95500 has a typical yield strength of 300 MPa (43.5 ksi) against 165 MPa (23.9 ksi) for C87200 — about 82% more. Tensile strength is 700 MPa (102 ksi) vs 379 MPa (55 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C87200 or C95500?

C87200 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while C95500 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, C87200 or C95500?

C87200. Its weldability rates excellent (88/100) against good (60/100) for C95500.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C87200 and C95500 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.