Copper Alloy C86300 vs ZCuZn26Al4Fe3Mn3
Copper Alloy · grade comparison
Copper Alloy C86300 and ZCuZn26Al4Fe3Mn3 are both copper alloy grades. C86300 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 470 MPa (68.2 ksi) against 330 MPa (47.9 ksi) for ZCuZn26Al4Fe3Mn3, about 42% more; tensile strength follows at 820 MPa (119 ksi) vs 620 MPa (89.9 ksi). In exchange, ZCuZn26Al4Fe3Mn3 is the more ductile: elongation 20% versus 15% for C86300, and C86300 is harder (225 HB vs 160 HB). ZCuZn26Al4Fe3Mn3 runs hotter in service (250°C vs 200°C continuous) and ZCuZn26Al4Fe3Mn3 conducts heat better (40 W/m·K vs 36 W/m·K). On the shop floor, ZCuZn26Al4Fe3Mn3 machines more easily (fair vs poor) and ZCuZn26Al4Fe3Mn3 sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than C86300 (specialty, $$$$$).
C86300Choose it when strength drives the design.
ZCuZn26Al4Fe3Mn3Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.
C86300 vs ZCuZn26Al4Fe3Mn3: propertiesHow to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all copper alloy grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
How to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all copper alloy grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
Mechanical
Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.
Elastic (Young's) Modulus
Bulk Modulus
Tensile Strength (Ultimate)
Yield Strength (0.2% offset)
Elongation at Break
Reduction in Area
Compressive Strength
Shear Strength
Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)
Hardness, Brinell
Hardness, Rockwell B
Hardness, Vickers
Same in both: Shear Modulus 39 GPa5.7 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.34 · Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT) 20 J14.8 ft·lbf
Physical
Density and transition temperatures.
Density
Melting Point (Solidus)
Liquidus Temperature
Thermal
How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.
Thermal Conductivity
Specific Heat Capacity
Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)
Max Service Temperature (continuous)
Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 175 J/g75.2 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -100°C-148 °F
Electrical
Conductivity and insulation.
Electrical Resistivity
Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 8 % IACS
Chemical & Environmental
Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).
Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)
Corrosion Resistance
Manufacturability
FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.
Machinability
Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)
Castability
Brazeability / Solderability
Same in both: Weldability 30 / 100 · Formability (cold) 15 / 100 · Polishability 60 / 100
Sustainability
Primary-production footprint per kilogram.
Embodied Water
Typical Recycled Content
Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 3.6 kg CO₂/kg
Common Calculations
Ratios derived from the values above.
Specific Strength (UTS / density)
Specific Stiffness (E / density)
Modulus of Resilience
Thermal Diffusivity
Thermal Shock Resistance Index
Strength versus weight
Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.
Manufacturing and finishing
| Capability | C86300 | ZCuZn26Al4Fe3Mn3 |
|---|---|---|
| CNC machining | Yes | — |
| Default condition | As Cast | — |
| Relative cost | $$$$$ Specialty | $$$ Premium |
| Min. machined wall | 0.8 mm | — |
| Best machined surface | Ra 1.6 µm | — |
| Chrome Plating | Yes | — |
| Electropolishing | Yes | — |
| Nickel Plating | Yes | — |
| Painting | Yes | — |
| Tin Plating | Yes | — |
They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.
C86300 vs ZCuZn26Al4Fe3Mn3 — frequently asked
Is C86300 stronger than ZCuZn26Al4Fe3Mn3?
Yes. C86300 has a typical yield strength of 470 MPa (68.2 ksi) against 330 MPa (47.9 ksi) for ZCuZn26Al4Fe3Mn3 — about 42% more. Tensile strength is 820 MPa (119 ksi) vs 620 MPa (89.9 ksi).
Which is cheaper, C86300 or ZCuZn26Al4Fe3Mn3?
ZCuZn26Al4Fe3Mn3 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while C86300 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.
Which is easier to machine, C86300 or ZCuZn26Al4Fe3Mn3?
ZCuZn26Al4Fe3Mn3. Its machinability rates fair (35/100) against poor (25/100) for C86300.
Ready to make it?
Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C86300 and ZCuZn26Al4Fe3Mn3 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.
Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.