FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C84400 vs C86100

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C84400 and C86100 are both copper alloy grades. C86100 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 415 MPa (60.2 ksi) against 110 MPa (16 ksi) for C84400, about 3.8 times as much; tensile strength follows at 820 MPa (119 ksi) vs 234 MPa (33.9 ksi). In exchange, C84400 is the more ductile: elongation 26% versus 20% for C86100, and C86100 is harder (225 HB vs 55 HB). C86100 is lighter (7.53 g/cm³ vs 8.8 g/cm³ for C84400) and C86100 is stiffer (103 GPa vs 95 GPa). On the shop floor, C84400 machines more easily (excellent vs poor), C86100 welds better (30 vs 20 out of 100), and C86100 sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than C84400 (specialty, $$$$$).

C84400Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

C86100Choose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

C84400 vs C86100: properties

C84400C86100

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

95 GPa13.8 Msi
103 GPa14.9 Msi

Shear Modulus

36 GPa5.2 Msi
39 GPa5.7 Msi

Bulk Modulus

115 GPa16.7 Msi
107 GPa15.5 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

234 MPa33.9 ksi
820 MPa119 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

110 MPa16 ksi
415 MPa60.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

26%
20%

Compressive Strength

260 MPa37.7 ksi
—

Shear Strength

165 MPa23.9 ksi
480 MPa69.6 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

76 MPa11 ksi
205 MPa29.7 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

55 HB
225 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

25 HRB
96 HRB

Reduction in Area

—
20%

Hardness, Vickers

—
235 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.34 · Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT) 20 J14.8 ft·lbf

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.8 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
7.53 g/cm³0.27 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

843°C1,549 °F
862°C1,584 °F

Liquidus Temperature

954°C1,749 °F
899°C1,650 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

72 W/m·K41.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F
36 W/m·K20.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

18 µm/m·K10 µin/in·°F
21 µm/m·K11.7 µin/in·°F

Min Service Temperature

-200°C-328 °F
-100°C-148 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 170 J/g73.1 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 200°C392 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

16.4 % IACS
8 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.05×10⁻⁷ Ω·m4.13 µΩ·in
2.16×10⁻⁷ Ω·m8.5 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.28 V
-0.27 V

Corrosion Resistance

58 / 100
55 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

90 / 100
30 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

90%
30%

Weldability

20 / 100
30 / 100

Formability (cold)

10 / 100
12 / 100

Castability

90 / 100
80 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

80 / 100
25 / 100

Same in both: Polishability 60 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

42 MJ/kg18,057 BTU/lb
45 MJ/kg19,347 BTU/lb

Typical Recycled Content

85%
75%

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 3.2 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

27 kN·m/kg
109 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

10.8 MN·m/kg
13.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

64 kJ/m³
836 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

21.7 mm²/s
12.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

10
14

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC84400C86100

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC84400C86100
CNC machiningYes—
Default conditionAs Cast—
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
Chrome PlatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Tin PlatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C84400 vs C86100 — frequently asked

Is C86100 stronger than C84400?

Yes. C86100 has a typical yield strength of 415 MPa (60.2 ksi) against 110 MPa (16 ksi) for C84400 — about 3.8 times as much. Tensile strength is 820 MPa (119 ksi) vs 234 MPa (33.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C84400 or C86100?

C86100 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while C84400 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, C84400 or C86100?

C84400. Its machinability rates excellent (90/100) against poor (30/100) for C86100; for welding the order is C86100 first (poor, 30/100) then C84400 (poor, 20/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C84400 and C86100 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.