FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C84800 vs ZCuPb30

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C84800 and ZCuPb30 are both copper alloy grades. C84800 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 124 MPa (18 ksi) against 32 MPa (4.64 ksi) for ZCuPb30, about 3.9 times as much; tensile strength follows at 262 MPa (38 ksi) vs 65 MPa (9.43 ksi). C84800 is the more ductile: elongation 35% versus 5% for ZCuPb30, and C84800 is harder (55 HB vs 27 HB). C84800 is lighter (8.55 g/cm³ vs 9.5 g/cm³ for ZCuPb30) and C84800 is stiffer (86 GPa vs 72 GPa). On the shop floor, C84800 welds better (poor vs not recommended) and ZCuPb30 sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than C84800 (specialty, $$$$$).

C84800Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

ZCuPb30Choose it when cost is the deciding factor.

C84800 vs ZCuPb30: properties

C84800ZCuPb30

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

86 GPa12.5 Msi
72 GPa10.4 Msi

Shear Modulus

32 GPa4.6 Msi
27 GPa3.9 Msi

Bulk Modulus

105 GPa15.2 Msi
85 GPa12.3 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

262 MPa38 ksi
65 MPa9.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

124 MPa18 ksi
32 MPa4.6 ksi

Elongation at Break

35%
5%

Shear Strength

190 MPa27.6 ksi
50 MPa7.3 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

76 MPa11 ksi
25 MPa3.6 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

55 HB
27 HB

Reduction in Area

—
5%

Compressive Strength

—
60 MPa8.7 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
6 J4.4 ft·lbf

Hardness, Vickers

—
29 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.34

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.55 g/cm³0.31 lb/in³
9.5 g/cm³0.34 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

843°C1,549 °F
327°C621 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,010°C1,850 °F
990°C1,814 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

72 W/m·K41.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F
60 W/m·K34.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F
310 J/kg·K0.07 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

18 µm/m·K10 µin/in·°F
18.5 µm/m·K10.3 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

170 J/g73.1 BTU/lb
150 J/g64.5 BTU/lb

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-100°C-148 °F

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 200°C392 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

16 % IACS
30 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.08×10⁻⁷ Ω·m4.25 µΩ·in
5.7×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.24 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.25 V
-0.35 V

Corrosion Resistance

58 / 100
42 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

88 / 100
85 / 100

Weldability

20 / 100
8 / 100

Castability

90 / 100
45 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

60 / 100
30 / 100

Polishability

55 / 100
40 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

—
80%

Formability (cold)

—
12 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

45 MJ/kg19,347 BTU/lb
46 MJ/kg19,776 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3 kg CO₂/kg
3.2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

250 L/kg30 gal/lb
200 L/kg24 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

85%
70%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

31 kN·m/kg
7 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

10.1 MN·m/kg
7.6 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

89 kJ/m³
7 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

22.3 mm²/s
20.4 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

12
3

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC84800ZCuPb30

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC84800ZCuPb30
CNC machiningYes—
Default conditionAs Cast—
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
Chrome PlatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Tin PlatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C84800 vs ZCuPb30 — frequently asked

Is C84800 stronger than ZCuPb30?

Yes. C84800 has a typical yield strength of 124 MPa (18 ksi) against 32 MPa (4.64 ksi) for ZCuPb30 — about 3.9 times as much. Tensile strength is 262 MPa (38 ksi) vs 65 MPa (9.43 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C84800 or ZCuPb30?

ZCuPb30 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while C84800 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, C84800 or ZCuPb30?

C84800. Its weldability rates poor (20/100) against not recommended (8/100) for ZCuPb30.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C84800 and ZCuPb30 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.