FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C84800 vs ZCuAl8Mn13Fe3Ni2

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C84800 and ZCuAl8Mn13Fe3Ni2 are both copper alloy grades. ZCuAl8Mn13Fe3Ni2 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 320 MPa (46.4 ksi) against 124 MPa (18 ksi) for C84800, about 158% more; tensile strength follows at 690 MPa (100 ksi) vs 262 MPa (38 ksi). In exchange, C84800 is the more ductile: elongation 35% versus 22% for ZCuAl8Mn13Fe3Ni2, and ZCuAl8Mn13Fe3Ni2 is harder (180 HB vs 55 HB). ZCuAl8Mn13Fe3Ni2 is lighter (7.53 g/cm³ vs 8.55 g/cm³ for C84800) and ZCuAl8Mn13Fe3Ni2 is stiffer (120 GPa vs 86 GPa). On the shop floor, C84800 machines more easily (excellent vs fair), ZCuAl8Mn13Fe3Ni2 welds better (good vs poor), and ZCuAl8Mn13Fe3Ni2 sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than C84800 (specialty, $$$$$).

C84800Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

ZCuAl8Mn13Fe3Ni2Choose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

C84800 vs ZCuAl8Mn13Fe3Ni2: properties

C84800ZCuAl8Mn13Fe3Ni2

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

86 GPa12.5 Msi
120 GPa17.4 Msi

Shear Modulus

32 GPa4.6 Msi
45 GPa6.5 Msi

Bulk Modulus

105 GPa15.2 Msi
111 GPa16.1 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.34
0.32

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

262 MPa38 ksi
690 MPa100 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

124 MPa18 ksi
320 MPa46.4 ksi

Elongation at Break

35%
22%

Shear Strength

190 MPa27.6 ksi
420 MPa60.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

76 MPa11 ksi
250 MPa36.3 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

55 HB
180 HB

Reduction in Area

—
25%

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
50 MPa·√m45.5 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
35 J25.8 ft·lbf

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
88 HRB

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
10 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

—
189 HV

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.55 g/cm³0.31 lb/in³
7.53 g/cm³0.27 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

843°C1,549 °F
870°C1,598 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,010°C1,850 °F
900°C1,652 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

72 W/m·K41.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F
12 W/m·K6.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F
419 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

18 µm/m·K10 µin/in·°F
16.2 µm/m·K9 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

170 J/g73.1 BTU/lb
—

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
300°C572 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-100°C-148 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

16 % IACS
3 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.08×10⁻⁷ Ω·m4.25 µΩ·in
5.7×10⁻⁷ Ω·m22.4 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.25 V
-0.28 V

Corrosion Resistance

58 / 100
75 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

88 / 100
45 / 100

Weldability

20 / 100
60 / 100

Castability

90 / 100
75 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

60 / 100
25 / 100

Polishability

55 / 100
70 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

—
50%

Formability (cold)

—
20 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

45 MJ/kg19,347 BTU/lb
50 MJ/kg21,496 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3 kg CO₂/kg
3.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

250 L/kg30 gal/lb
280 L/kg33.6 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

85%
35%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

31 kN·m/kg
92 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

10.1 MN·m/kg
15.9 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

89 kJ/m³
427 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

22.3 mm²/s
3.8 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

12
4

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC84800ZCuAl8Mn13Fe3Ni2

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC84800ZCuAl8Mn13Fe3Ni2
CNC machiningYes—
Default conditionAs Cast—
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
Chrome PlatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Tin PlatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C84800 vs ZCuAl8Mn13Fe3Ni2 — frequently asked

Is ZCuAl8Mn13Fe3Ni2 stronger than C84800?

Yes. ZCuAl8Mn13Fe3Ni2 has a typical yield strength of 320 MPa (46.4 ksi) against 124 MPa (18 ksi) for C84800 — about 158% more. Tensile strength is 690 MPa (100 ksi) vs 262 MPa (38 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C84800 or ZCuAl8Mn13Fe3Ni2?

ZCuAl8Mn13Fe3Ni2 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while C84800 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, C84800 or ZCuAl8Mn13Fe3Ni2?

C84800. Its machinability rates excellent (88/100) against fair (45/100) for ZCuAl8Mn13Fe3Ni2; for welding the order is ZCuAl8Mn13Fe3Ni2 first (good, 60/100) then C84800 (poor, 20/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C84800 and ZCuAl8Mn13Fe3Ni2 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.