Copper Alloy C84800 vs C94800
Copper Alloy · grade comparison
Copper Alloy C84800 and C94800 are both copper alloy grades. C94800 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 155 MPa (22.5 ksi) against 124 MPa (18 ksi) for C84800, about 25% more; tensile strength follows at 310 MPa (45 ksi) vs 262 MPa (38 ksi). C94800 is harder — 80 HB against 55 HB for C84800 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. C94800 is stiffer (110 GPa vs 86 GPa) and C94800 runs hotter in service (230°C vs 200°C continuous). On the shop floor, C94800 welds better (30 vs 20 out of 100) and C94800 sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than C84800 (specialty, $$$$$).
C94800Choose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.
C84800 vs C94800: propertiesHow to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all copper alloy grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
How to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all copper alloy grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
Mechanical
Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.
Elastic (Young's) Modulus
Shear Modulus
Bulk Modulus
Tensile Strength (Ultimate)
Yield Strength (0.2% offset)
Shear Strength
Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)
Hardness, Brinell
Reduction in Area
Compressive Strength
Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)
Hardness, Rockwell B
Hardness, Vickers
Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.34 · Elongation at Break 35%
Physical
Density and transition temperatures.
Density
Melting Point (Solidus)
Liquidus Temperature
Thermal
How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.
Thermal Conductivity
Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)
Latent Heat of Fusion
Max Service Temperature (continuous)
Min Service Temperature
Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F
Electrical
Conductivity and insulation.
Electrical Conductivity
Electrical Resistivity
Chemical & Environmental
Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).
Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)
Corrosion Resistance
Manufacturability
FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.
Machinability
Weldability
Castability
Brazeability / Solderability
Polishability
Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)
Formability (cold)
Sustainability
Primary-production footprint per kilogram.
Embodied Energy (primary production)
Embodied Carbon (primary production)
Embodied Water
Typical Recycled Content
Common Calculations
Ratios derived from the values above.
Specific Strength (UTS / density)
Specific Stiffness (E / density)
Modulus of Resilience
Thermal Diffusivity
Thermal Shock Resistance Index
Strength versus weight
Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.
Manufacturing and finishing
| Capability | C84800 | C94800 |
|---|---|---|
| CNC machining | Yes | — |
| Default condition | As Cast | — |
| Relative cost | $$$$$ Specialty | $$$$ High |
| Min. machined wall | 0.8 mm | — |
| Best machined surface | Ra 1.6 µm | — |
| Chrome Plating | Yes | — |
| Electropolishing | Yes | — |
| Nickel Plating | Yes | — |
| Painting | Yes | — |
| Tin Plating | Yes | — |
They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.
C84800 vs C94800 — frequently asked
Is C94800 stronger than C84800?
Yes. C94800 has a typical yield strength of 155 MPa (22.5 ksi) against 124 MPa (18 ksi) for C84800 — about 25% more. Tensile strength is 310 MPa (45 ksi) vs 262 MPa (38 ksi).
Which is cheaper, C84800 or C94800?
C94800 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while C84800 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.
Which is easier to machine, C84800 or C94800?
C84800. Its machinability rates excellent (88/100) against very good (80/100) for C94800; for welding the order is C94800 first (poor, 30/100) then C84800 (poor, 20/100).
Ready to make it?
Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C84800 and C94800 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.
Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.