FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C84800 vs C90200

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C84800 and C90200 are both copper alloy grades. C90200 is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 276 MPa (40 ksi) against 262 MPa (38 ksi) for C84800, about 5% more. In exchange, C84800 is the more ductile: elongation 35% versus 30% for C90200, and C90200 is harder (60 HB vs 55 HB). C90200 is stiffer (100 GPa vs 86 GPa) and C90200 runs hotter in service (230°C vs 200°C continuous). On the shop floor, C84800 machines more easily (excellent vs poor), C90200 welds better (fair vs poor), and C90200 sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than C84800 (specialty, $$$$$).

C84800Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

C90200Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

C84800 vs C90200: properties

C84800C90200

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

86 GPa12.5 Msi
100 GPa14.5 Msi

Shear Modulus

32 GPa4.6 Msi
38 GPa5.5 Msi

Bulk Modulus

105 GPa15.2 Msi
110 GPa16 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

262 MPa38 ksi
276 MPa40 ksi

Elongation at Break

35%
30%

Shear Strength

190 MPa27.6 ksi
200 MPa29 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

76 MPa11 ksi
90 MPa13.1 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

55 HB
60 HB

Reduction in Area

—
28%

Compressive Strength

—
240 MPa34.8 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
20 J14.8 ft·lbf

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
25 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

—
63 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.34 · Yield Strength (0.2% offset) 124 MPa18 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.55 g/cm³0.31 lb/in³
8.72 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

843°C1,549 °F
855°C1,571 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,010°C1,850 °F
1,000°C1,832 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

72 W/m·K41.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F
71 W/m·K41 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

170 J/g73.1 BTU/lb
190 J/g81.7 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
230°C446 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 18 µm/m·K10 µin/in·°F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

16 % IACS
14 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.08×10⁻⁷ Ω·m4.25 µΩ·in
1.23×10⁻⁷ Ω·m4.84 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

58 / 100
72 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.25 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

88 / 100
32 / 100

Weldability

20 / 100
45 / 100

Castability

90 / 100
70 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

60 / 100
85 / 100

Polishability

55 / 100
65 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

—
30%

Formability (cold)

—
10 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

45 MJ/kg19,347 BTU/lb
55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3 kg CO₂/kg
3.8 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

250 L/kg30 gal/lb
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

85%
70%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

31 kN·m/kg
32 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

10.1 MN·m/kg
11.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

89 kJ/m³
77 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

22.3 mm²/s
21.6 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

12
11

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC84800C90200

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC84800C90200
CNC machiningYes—
Default conditionAs Cast—
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
Chrome PlatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Tin PlatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C84800 vs C90200 — frequently asked

Is C90200 stronger than C84800?

Yes. C90200 has a typical tensile strength of 276 MPa (40 ksi) against 262 MPa (38 ksi) for C84800 — about 5% more.

Which is cheaper, C84800 or C90200?

C90200 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while C84800 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, C84800 or C90200?

C84800. Its machinability rates excellent (88/100) against poor (32/100) for C90200; for welding the order is C90200 first (fair, 45/100) then C84800 (poor, 20/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C84800 and C90200 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.