FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C84400 vs C90200

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C84400 and C90200 are both copper alloy grades. C90200 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 124 MPa (18 ksi) against 110 MPa (16 ksi) for C84400, about 13% more; tensile strength follows at 276 MPa (40 ksi) vs 234 MPa (33.9 ksi). C90200 is the more ductile: elongation 30% versus 26% for C84400, and C90200 is harder (60 HB vs 55 HB). C90200 is stiffer (100 GPa vs 95 GPa) and C90200 runs hotter in service (230°C vs 200°C continuous). On the shop floor, C84400 machines more easily (excellent vs poor), C90200 welds better (fair vs poor), and C90200 sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than C84400 (specialty, $$$$$).

C84400Choose it when the part is machined in volume.

C90200Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

C84400 vs C90200: properties

C84400C90200

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

95 GPa13.8 Msi
100 GPa14.5 Msi

Shear Modulus

36 GPa5.2 Msi
38 GPa5.5 Msi

Bulk Modulus

115 GPa16.7 Msi
110 GPa16 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

234 MPa33.9 ksi
276 MPa40 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

110 MPa16 ksi
124 MPa18 ksi

Elongation at Break

26%
30%

Compressive Strength

260 MPa37.7 ksi
240 MPa34.8 ksi

Shear Strength

165 MPa23.9 ksi
200 MPa29 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

76 MPa11 ksi
90 MPa13.1 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

55 HB
60 HB

Reduction in Area

—
28%

Hardness, Vickers

—
63 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.34 · Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT) 20 J14.8 ft·lbf · Hardness, Rockwell B 25 HRB

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.8 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
8.72 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

843°C1,549 °F
855°C1,571 °F

Liquidus Temperature

954°C1,749 °F
1,000°C1,832 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

72 W/m·K41.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F
71 W/m·K41 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

170 J/g73.1 BTU/lb
190 J/g81.7 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
230°C446 °F

Min Service Temperature

-200°C-328 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 18 µm/m·K10 µin/in·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

16.4 % IACS
14 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.05×10⁻⁷ Ω·m4.13 µΩ·in
1.23×10⁻⁷ Ω·m4.84 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.28 V
-0.25 V

Corrosion Resistance

58 / 100
72 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

90 / 100
32 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

90%
30%

Weldability

20 / 100
45 / 100

Castability

90 / 100
70 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

80 / 100
85 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
65 / 100

Same in both: Formability (cold) 10 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

42 MJ/kg18,057 BTU/lb
55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.2 kg CO₂/kg
3.8 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

250 L/kg30 gal/lb
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

85%
70%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

27 kN·m/kg
32 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

10.8 MN·m/kg
11.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

64 kJ/m³
77 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

21.7 mm²/s
21.6 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

10
11

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC84400C90200

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC84400C90200
CNC machiningYes—
Default conditionAs Cast—
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
Chrome PlatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Tin PlatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C84400 vs C90200 — frequently asked

Is C90200 stronger than C84400?

Yes. C90200 has a typical yield strength of 124 MPa (18 ksi) against 110 MPa (16 ksi) for C84400 — about 13% more. Tensile strength is 276 MPa (40 ksi) vs 234 MPa (33.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C84400 or C90200?

C90200 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while C84400 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, C84400 or C90200?

C84400. Its machinability rates excellent (90/100) against poor (32/100) for C90200; for welding the order is C90200 first (fair, 45/100) then C84400 (poor, 20/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C84400 and C90200 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.