FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C84400 vs CC495K

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C84400 and CC495K are both copper alloy grades. CC495K is the stronger of the two: yield strength 140 MPa (20.3 ksi) against 110 MPa (16 ksi) for C84400, about 27% more; tensile strength follows at 270 MPa (39.2 ksi) vs 234 MPa (33.9 ksi). In exchange, C84400 is the more ductile: elongation 26% versus 10% for CC495K, and CC495K is harder (75 HB vs 55 HB). C84400 is stiffer (95 GPa vs 76 GPa) and CC495K runs hotter in service (250°C vs 200°C continuous). On the shop floor, C84400 welds better (poor vs not recommended) and CC495K sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than C84400 (specialty, $$$$$).

C84400Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when it will be welded.

CC495KChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

C84400 vs CC495K: properties

C84400CC495K

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

95 GPa13.8 Msi
76 GPa11 Msi

Shear Modulus

36 GPa5.2 Msi
28 GPa4.1 Msi

Bulk Modulus

115 GPa16.7 Msi
78 GPa11.3 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

234 MPa33.9 ksi
270 MPa39.2 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

110 MPa16 ksi
140 MPa20.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

26%
10%

Compressive Strength

260 MPa37.7 ksi
250 MPa36.3 ksi

Shear Strength

165 MPa23.9 ksi
190 MPa27.6 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

76 MPa11 ksi
75 MPa10.9 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

20 J14.8 ft·lbf
8 J5.9 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

55 HB
75 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

25 HRB
32 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

—
80 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.34

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.8 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
8.9 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

843°C1,549 °F
762°C1,404 °F

Liquidus Temperature

954°C1,749 °F
930°C1,706 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

72 W/m·K41.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F
47 W/m·K27.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F
251 J/kg·K0.06 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

18 µm/m·K10 µin/in·°F
18.5 µm/m·K10.3 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
250°C482 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 170 J/g73.1 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -200°C-328 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

16.4 % IACS
10 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.05×10⁻⁷ Ω·m4.13 µΩ·in
1.72×10⁻⁷ Ω·m6.77 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

58 / 100
56 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.28 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

90 / 100
85 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

90%
80%

Weldability

20 / 100
10 / 100

Castability

90 / 100
88 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

80 / 100
60 / 100

Same in both: Formability (cold) 10 / 100 · Polishability 60 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

42 MJ/kg18,057 BTU/lb
55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.2 kg CO₂/kg
3.6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

250 L/kg30 gal/lb
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

85%
70%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

27 kN·m/kg
30 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

10.8 MN·m/kg
8.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

64 kJ/m³
129 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

21.7 mm²/s
21 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

10
9

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC84400CC495K

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC84400CC495K
CNC machiningYes—
Default conditionAs Cast—
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
Chrome PlatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Tin PlatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C84400 vs CC495K — frequently asked

Is CC495K stronger than C84400?

Yes. CC495K has a typical yield strength of 140 MPa (20.3 ksi) against 110 MPa (16 ksi) for C84400 — about 27% more. Tensile strength is 270 MPa (39.2 ksi) vs 234 MPa (33.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C84400 or CC495K?

CC495K is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while C84400 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, C84400 or CC495K?

C84400, by a small margin. Both rate excellent for machinability — 90/100 against 85/100 for CC495K; for welding the order is C84400 first (poor, 20/100) then CC495K (not recommended, 10/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C84400 and CC495K side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.