FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C84400 vs CC492K

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C84400 and CC492K are both copper alloy grades. CC492K is the stronger of the two: yield strength 150 MPa (21.8 ksi) against 110 MPa (16 ksi) for C84400, about 36% more; tensile strength follows at 290 MPa (42.1 ksi) vs 234 MPa (33.9 ksi). In exchange, C84400 is the more ductile: elongation 26% versus 14% for CC492K, and CC492K is harder (80 HB vs 55 HB). CC492K runs hotter in service (230°C vs 200°C continuous) and C84400 conducts electricity better (16.4 % IACS vs 14 % IACS). On the shop floor, C84400 machines more easily (excellent vs very good), CC492K welds better (30 vs 20 out of 100), and CC492K sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than C84400 (specialty, $$$$$).

C84400Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

CC492KChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

C84400 vs CC492K: properties

C84400CC492K

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

95 GPa13.8 Msi
98 GPa14.2 Msi

Shear Modulus

36 GPa5.2 Msi
37 GPa5.4 Msi

Bulk Modulus

115 GPa16.7 Msi
105 GPa15.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

234 MPa33.9 ksi
290 MPa42.1 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

110 MPa16 ksi
150 MPa21.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

26%
14%

Compressive Strength

260 MPa37.7 ksi
320 MPa46.4 ksi

Shear Strength

165 MPa23.9 ksi
195 MPa28.3 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

76 MPa11 ksi
100 MPa14.5 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

55 HB
80 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

25 HRB
45 HRB

Reduction in Area

—
16%

Hardness, Vickers

—
84 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.34 · Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT) 20 J14.8 ft·lbf

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.8 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
8.75 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

843°C1,549 °F
850°C1,562 °F

Liquidus Temperature

954°C1,749 °F
1,000°C1,832 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

72 W/m·K41.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F
68 W/m·K39.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

170 J/g73.1 BTU/lb
175 J/g75.2 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
230°C446 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 18 µm/m·K10 µin/in·°F · Min Service Temperature -200°C-328 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

16.4 % IACS
14 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.05×10⁻⁷ Ω·m4.13 µΩ·in
1.23×10⁻⁷ Ω·m4.84 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

58 / 100
66 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.28 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

90 / 100
80 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

90%
92%

Weldability

20 / 100
30 / 100

Formability (cold)

10 / 100
15 / 100

Castability

90 / 100
88 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

80 / 100
82 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
65 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

42 MJ/kg18,057 BTU/lb
58 MJ/kg24,936 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.2 kg CO₂/kg
4 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

250 L/kg30 gal/lb
320 L/kg38.3 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

85%
80%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

27 kN·m/kg
33 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

10.8 MN·m/kg
11.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

64 kJ/m³
115 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

21.7 mm²/s
20.6 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

10
11

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC84400CC492K

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC84400CC492K
CNC machiningYes—
Default conditionAs Cast—
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
Chrome PlatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Tin PlatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C84400 vs CC492K — frequently asked

Is CC492K stronger than C84400?

Yes. CC492K has a typical yield strength of 150 MPa (21.8 ksi) against 110 MPa (16 ksi) for C84400 — about 36% more. Tensile strength is 290 MPa (42.1 ksi) vs 234 MPa (33.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C84400 or CC492K?

CC492K is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while C84400 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, C84400 or CC492K?

C84400. Its machinability rates excellent (90/100) against very good (80/100) for CC492K; for welding the order is CC492K first (poor, 30/100) then C84400 (poor, 20/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C84400 and CC492K side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.