Copper Alloy C83400 vs ZCuZn35Al2Mn2Fe1
Copper Alloy · grade comparison
Copper Alloy C83400 and ZCuZn35Al2Mn2Fe1 are both copper alloy grades. ZCuZn35Al2Mn2Fe1 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 195 MPa (28.3 ksi) against 69 MPa (10 ksi) for C83400, about 183% more; tensile strength follows at 480 MPa (69.6 ksi) vs 234 MPa (33.9 ksi). In exchange, C83400 is the more ductile: elongation 35% versus 25% for ZCuZn35Al2Mn2Fe1, and ZCuZn35Al2Mn2Fe1 is harder (105 HB vs 50 HB). ZCuZn35Al2Mn2Fe1 is lighter (8.5 g/cm³ vs 8.8 g/cm³ for C83400) and C83400 conducts heat better (159 W/m·K vs 85 W/m·K). On the shop floor, C83400 machines more easily (good vs fair) and C83400 welds better (45 vs 35 out of 100).
C83400Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.
ZCuZn35Al2Mn2Fe1Choose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.
C83400 vs ZCuZn35Al2Mn2Fe1: propertiesHow to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all copper alloy grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
How to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all copper alloy grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
Mechanical
Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.
Elastic (Young's) Modulus
Shear Modulus
Tensile Strength (Ultimate)
Yield Strength (0.2% offset)
Elongation at Break
Reduction in Area
Shear Strength
Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)
Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)
Hardness, Brinell
Hardness, Vickers
Compressive Strength
Hardness, Rockwell B
Same in both: Bulk Modulus 105 GPa15.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.34
Physical
Density and transition temperatures.
Density
Melting Point (Solidus)
Liquidus Temperature
Thermal
How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.
Thermal Conductivity
Specific Heat Capacity
Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)
Latent Heat of Fusion
Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 200°C392 °F · Min Service Temperature -200°C-328 °F
Electrical
Conductivity and insulation.
Electrical Conductivity
Electrical Resistivity
Chemical & Environmental
Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).
Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)
Corrosion Resistance
Manufacturability
FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.
Machinability
Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)
Weldability
Formability (cold)
Castability
Brazeability / Solderability
Same in both: Polishability 70 / 100
Sustainability
Primary-production footprint per kilogram.
Embodied Energy (primary production)
Embodied Carbon (primary production)
Embodied Water
Typical Recycled Content
Common Calculations
Ratios derived from the values above.
Specific Strength (UTS / density)
Specific Stiffness (E / density)
Modulus of Resilience
Thermal Diffusivity
Thermal Shock Resistance Index
Strength versus weight
Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.
Manufacturing and finishing
| Capability | C83400 | ZCuZn35Al2Mn2Fe1 |
|---|---|---|
| CNC machining | Yes | — |
| Default condition | As Cast | — |
| Relative cost | $$$$ High | $$$$ High |
| Min. machined wall | 0.8 mm | — |
| Best machined surface | Ra 1.6 µm | — |
| Chrome Plating | Yes | — |
| Electropolishing | Yes | — |
| Nickel Plating | Yes | — |
| Painting | Yes | — |
| Tin Plating | Yes | — |
They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.
C83400 vs ZCuZn35Al2Mn2Fe1 — frequently asked
Is ZCuZn35Al2Mn2Fe1 stronger than C83400?
Yes. ZCuZn35Al2Mn2Fe1 has a typical yield strength of 195 MPa (28.3 ksi) against 69 MPa (10 ksi) for C83400 — about 183% more. Tensile strength is 480 MPa (69.6 ksi) vs 234 MPa (33.9 ksi).
Which is cheaper, C83400 or ZCuZn35Al2Mn2Fe1?
Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.
Which is easier to machine, C83400 or ZCuZn35Al2Mn2Fe1?
C83400. Its machinability rates good (58/100) against fair (35/100) for ZCuZn35Al2Mn2Fe1; for welding the order is C83400 first (fair, 45/100) then ZCuZn35Al2Mn2Fe1 (fair, 35/100).
Ready to make it?
Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C83400 and ZCuZn35Al2Mn2Fe1 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.
Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.