Copper Alloy C83400 vs C85200
Copper Alloy · grade comparison
Copper Alloy C83400 and C85200 are both copper alloy grades. C85200 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 90 MPa (13.1 ksi) against 69 MPa (10 ksi) for C83400, about 30% more; tensile strength follows at 262 MPa (38 ksi) vs 234 MPa (33.9 ksi). C83400 is harder — 50 HB against 45 HB for C85200 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. C85200 is lighter (8.47 g/cm³ vs 8.8 g/cm³ for C83400) and C83400 is stiffer (96.5 GPa vs 90 GPa). On the shop floor, C85200 machines more easily (very good vs good), C83400 welds better (fair vs poor), and C83400 forms better (30 vs 15 out of 100).
C83400Choose it when surface hardness matters, or when it will be welded.
C85200Choose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.
C83400 vs C85200: propertiesHow to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all copper alloy grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
How to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all copper alloy grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
Mechanical
Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.
Elastic (Young's) Modulus
Shear Modulus
Tensile Strength (Ultimate)
Yield Strength (0.2% offset)
Shear Strength
Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)
Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)
Hardness, Brinell
Hardness, Vickers
Compressive Strength
Same in both: Bulk Modulus 105 GPa15.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.34 · Elongation at Break 35% · Reduction in Area 30%
Physical
Density and transition temperatures.
Density
Melting Point (Solidus)
Liquidus Temperature
Thermal
How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.
Thermal Conductivity
Specific Heat Capacity
Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)
Latent Heat of Fusion
Min Service Temperature
Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 200°C392 °F
Electrical
Conductivity and insulation.
Electrical Conductivity
Electrical Resistivity
Chemical & Environmental
Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).
Corrosion Resistance
Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.25 V
Manufacturability
FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.
Machinability
Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)
Weldability
Formability (cold)
Castability
Brazeability / Solderability
Polishability
Sustainability
Primary-production footprint per kilogram.
Embodied Energy (primary production)
Embodied Carbon (primary production)
Embodied Water
Typical Recycled Content
Common Calculations
Ratios derived from the values above.
Specific Strength (UTS / density)
Specific Stiffness (E / density)
Modulus of Resilience
Thermal Diffusivity
Thermal Shock Resistance Index
Strength versus weight
Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.
Manufacturing and finishing
| Capability | C83400 | C85200 |
|---|---|---|
| CNC machining | Yes | — |
| Default condition | As Cast | — |
| Relative cost | $$$$ High | $$$$ High |
| Min. machined wall | 0.8 mm | — |
| Best machined surface | Ra 1.6 µm | — |
| Chrome Plating | Yes | — |
| Electropolishing | Yes | — |
| Nickel Plating | Yes | — |
| Painting | Yes | — |
| Tin Plating | Yes | — |
They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.
C83400 vs C85200 — frequently asked
Is C85200 stronger than C83400?
Yes. C85200 has a typical yield strength of 90 MPa (13.1 ksi) against 69 MPa (10 ksi) for C83400 — about 30% more. Tensile strength is 262 MPa (38 ksi) vs 234 MPa (33.9 ksi).
Which is cheaper, C83400 or C85200?
Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.
Which is easier to machine, C83400 or C85200?
C85200. Its machinability rates very good (80/100) against good (58/100) for C83400; for welding the order is C83400 first (fair, 45/100) then C85200 (poor, 20/100).
Ready to make it?
Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C83400 and C85200 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.
Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.