FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C83400 vs CC763S

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C83400 and CC763S are both copper alloy grades. CC763S is the stronger of the two: yield strength 300 MPa (43.5 ksi) against 69 MPa (10 ksi) for C83400, about 4.3 times as much; tensile strength follows at 640 MPa (92.8 ksi) vs 234 MPa (33.9 ksi). In exchange, C83400 is the more ductile: elongation 35% versus 14% for CC763S, and CC763S is harder (150 HB vs 50 HB). CC763S is lighter (7.9 g/cm³ vs 8.8 g/cm³ for C83400) and CC763S is stiffer (102 GPa vs 96.5 GPa). On the shop floor, C83400 machines more easily (good vs fair), C83400 welds better (fair vs poor), and CC763S sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than C83400 (high, $$$$).

C83400Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

CC763SChoose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

C83400 vs CC763S: properties

C83400CC763S

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

96.5 GPa14 Msi
102 GPa14.8 Msi

Shear Modulus

37 GPa5.4 Msi
39 GPa5.7 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

234 MPa33.9 ksi
640 MPa92.8 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

69 MPa10 ksi
300 MPa43.5 ksi

Elongation at Break

35%
14%

Reduction in Area

30%
18%

Shear Strength

165 MPa23.9 ksi
420 MPa60.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

70 MPa10.2 ksi
180 MPa26.1 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

40 J29.5 ft·lbf
20 J14.8 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

50 HB
150 HB

Hardness, Vickers

53 HV
158 HV

Compressive Strength

—
400 MPa58 ksi

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
80 HRB

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 105 GPa15.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.34

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.8 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
7.9 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,010°C1,850 °F
880°C1,616 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,055°C1,931 °F
910°C1,670 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

159 W/m·K91.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F
60 W/m·K34.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

376 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F
380 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

18.4 µm/m·K10.2 µin/in·°F
20.5 µm/m·K11.4 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

205 J/g88.1 BTU/lb
175 J/g75.2 BTU/lb

Min Service Temperature

-200°C-328 °F
-100°C-148 °F

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 200°C392 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

32 % IACS
12 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.39×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.12 µΩ·in
1.45×10⁻⁷ Ω·m5.71 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.25 V
-0.28 V

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 62 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

58 / 100
40 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

65%
30%

Weldability

45 / 100
30 / 100

Formability (cold)

30 / 100
20 / 100

Castability

72 / 100
80 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

88 / 100
55 / 100

Same in both: Polishability 70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

58 MJ/kg24,936 BTU/lb
48 MJ/kg20,636 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.6 kg CO₂/kg
3.2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

260 L/kg31.2 gal/lb
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

80%
70%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

27 kN·m/kg
81 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

11 MN·m/kg
12.9 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

25 kJ/m³
441 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

48.1 mm²/s
20 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

21
18

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC83400CC763S

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC83400CC763S
CNC machiningYes—
Default conditionAs Cast—
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
Chrome PlatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Tin PlatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C83400 vs CC763S — frequently asked

Is CC763S stronger than C83400?

Yes. CC763S has a typical yield strength of 300 MPa (43.5 ksi) against 69 MPa (10 ksi) for C83400 — about 4.3 times as much. Tensile strength is 640 MPa (92.8 ksi) vs 234 MPa (33.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C83400 or CC763S?

CC763S is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while C83400 is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, C83400 or CC763S?

C83400. Its machinability rates good (58/100) against fair (40/100) for CC763S; for welding the order is C83400 first (fair, 45/100) then CC763S (poor, 30/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C83400 and CC763S side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.