FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C77300 vs ERCuSi-A

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C77300 and ERCuSi-A are both copper alloy grades. C77300 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) against 195 MPa (28.3 ksi) for ERCuSi-A, about 41% more; tensile strength follows at 480 MPa (69.6 ksi) vs 350 MPa (50.8 ksi). In exchange, ERCuSi-A is the more ductile: elongation 38% versus 12% for C77300, and C77300 is harder (130 HB vs 85 HB). C77300 is stiffer (120 GPa vs 103 GPa) and C77300 runs hotter in service (300°C vs 200°C continuous). On the shop floor, ERCuSi-A welds better (excellent vs good).

C77300Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

ERCuSi-AChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when it will be welded.

C77300 vs ERCuSi-A: properties

C77300ERCuSi-A

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

120 GPa17.4 Msi
103 GPa14.9 Msi

Shear Modulus

45 GPa6.5 Msi
38.5 GPa5.6 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.33
0.35

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

480 MPa69.6 ksi
350 MPa50.8 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

275 MPa39.9 ksi
195 MPa28.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

12%
38%

Shear Strength

290 MPa42.1 ksi
215 MPa31.2 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

130 HB
85 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

72 HRB
45 HRB

Bulk Modulus

—
115 GPa16.7 Msi

Reduction in Area

—
45%

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

—
145 MPa21 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
60 J44.3 ft·lbf

Hardness, Vickers

—
90 HV

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.7 g/cm³0.31 lb/in³
8.53 g/cm³0.31 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

921°C1,690 °F
970°C1,778 °F

Liquidus Temperature

935°C1,715 °F
1,025°C1,877 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

45 W/m·K26 BTU/hr·ft·°F
36 W/m·K20.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

19.5 µm/m·K10.8 µin/in·°F
18 µm/m·K10 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

190 J/g81.7 BTU/lb
205 J/g88.1 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

300°C572 °F
200°C392 °F

Min Service Temperature

-100°C-148 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 380 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

2.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m9.84 µΩ·in
2.46×10⁻⁷ Ω·m9.69 µΩ·in

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 7 % IACS

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.25 V
-0.26 V

Corrosion Resistance

55 / 100
72 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

40 / 100
33 / 100

Weldability

55 / 100
90 / 100

Formability (cold)

50 / 100
70 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

95 / 100
92 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 30% · Castability 60 / 100 · Polishability 75 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

70 MJ/kg30,095 BTU/lb
57 MJ/kg24,506 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.5 kg CO₂/kg
3.8 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb
320 L/kg38.3 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

35%
40%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

55 kN·m/kg
41 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

13.8 MN·m/kg
12.1 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

315 kJ/m³
185 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

13.6 mm²/s
11.1 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

9
7

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleERCuSi-AC77300

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC77300ERCuSi-A
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C77300 vs ERCuSi-A — frequently asked

Is C77300 stronger than ERCuSi-A?

Yes. C77300 has a typical yield strength of 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) against 195 MPa (28.3 ksi) for ERCuSi-A — about 41% more. Tensile strength is 480 MPa (69.6 ksi) vs 350 MPa (50.8 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C77300 or ERCuSi-A?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, C77300 or ERCuSi-A?

C77300. Its machinability rates fair (40/100) against poor (33/100) for ERCuSi-A; for welding the order is ERCuSi-A first (excellent, 90/100) then C77300 (good, 55/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C77300 and ERCuSi-A side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.