FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C77300 vs ERCu

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C77300 and ERCu are both copper alloy grades. C77300 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) against 80 MPa (11.6 ksi) for ERCu, about 3.4 times as much; tensile strength follows at 480 MPa (69.6 ksi) vs 225 MPa (32.6 ksi). In exchange, ERCu is the more ductile: elongation 35% versus 12% for C77300, and C77300 is harder (130 HB vs 55 HB). C77300 runs hotter in service (300°C vs 250°C continuous) and ERCu conducts heat better (250 W/m·K vs 45 W/m·K). On the shop floor, C77300 machines more easily (fair vs poor) and ERCu welds better (very good vs good).

C77300Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

ERCuChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when it will be welded.

C77300 vs ERCu: properties

C77300ERCu

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

120 GPa17.4 Msi
115 GPa16.7 Msi

Shear Modulus

45 GPa6.5 Msi
44 GPa6.4 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.33
0.34

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

480 MPa69.6 ksi
225 MPa32.6 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

275 MPa39.9 ksi
80 MPa11.6 ksi

Elongation at Break

12%
35%

Shear Strength

290 MPa42.1 ksi
150 MPa21.8 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

130 HB
55 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

72 HRB
—

Bulk Modulus

—
140 GPa20.3 Msi

Reduction in Area

—
60%

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

—
70 MPa10.2 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
70 J51.6 ft·lbf

Hardness, Vickers

—
58 HV

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.7 g/cm³0.31 lb/in³
8.9 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

921°C1,690 °F
1,065°C1,949 °F

Liquidus Temperature

935°C1,715 °F
1,080°C1,976 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

45 W/m·K26 BTU/hr·ft·°F
250 W/m·K144 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

380 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F
385 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

19.5 µm/m·K10.8 µin/in·°F
17.7 µm/m·K9.8 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

190 J/g81.7 BTU/lb
205 J/g88.1 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

300°C572 °F
250°C482 °F

Min Service Temperature

-100°C-148 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

7 % IACS
40 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m9.84 µΩ·in
4.3×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.69 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.25 V
-0.3 V

Corrosion Resistance

55 / 100
62 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

40 / 100
30 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

30%
20%

Weldability

55 / 100
78 / 100

Formability (cold)

50 / 100
92 / 100

Castability

60 / 100
40 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

95 / 100
92 / 100

Polishability

75 / 100
78 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

70 MJ/kg30,095 BTU/lb
57 MJ/kg24,506 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.5 kg CO₂/kg
3.8 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb
250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 35%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

55 kN·m/kg
25 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

13.8 MN·m/kg
12.9 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

315 kJ/m³
28 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

13.6 mm²/s
73 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

9
28

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleERCuC77300

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC77300ERCu
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C77300 vs ERCu — frequently asked

Is C77300 stronger than ERCu?

Yes. C77300 has a typical yield strength of 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) against 80 MPa (11.6 ksi) for ERCu — about 3.4 times as much. Tensile strength is 480 MPa (69.6 ksi) vs 225 MPa (32.6 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C77300 or ERCu?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, C77300 or ERCu?

C77300. Its machinability rates fair (40/100) against poor (30/100) for ERCu; for welding the order is ERCu first (very good, 78/100) then C77300 (good, 55/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C77300 and ERCu side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.