FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C75700 vs C76200

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C75700 and C76200 are both copper alloy grades. C76200 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 448 MPa (65 ksi) against 420 MPa (60.9 ksi) for C75700, about 7% more. C76200 is harder — 155 HB against 135 HB for C75700 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. C75700 runs hotter in service (200°C vs 175°C continuous) and C75700 conducts heat better (45 W/m·K vs 29 W/m·K). On the shop floor, C76200 welds better (50 vs 40 out of 100).

C75700Choose it when the part sees heat.

C76200Choose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

C75700 vs C76200: properties

C75700C76200

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Bulk Modulus

130 GPa18.9 Msi
129 GPa18.7 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

496 MPa71.9 ksi
517 MPa75 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

420 MPa60.9 ksi
448 MPa65 ksi

Shear Strength

320 MPa46.4 ksi
330 MPa47.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

180 MPa26.1 ksi
215 MPa31.2 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

135 HB
155 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

74 HRB
82 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

145 HV
165 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 124 GPa18 Msi · Shear Modulus 46 GPa6.7 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.34 · Elongation at Break 10%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.72 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
8.7 g/cm³0.31 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,004°C1,839 °F
1,010°C1,850 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,038°C1,900 °F
1,050°C1,922 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

45 W/m·K26 BTU/hr·ft·°F
29 W/m·K16.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

180 J/g77.4 BTU/lb
175 J/g75.2 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
175°C347 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 16.2 µm/m·K9 µin/in·°F · Min Service Temperature -200°C-328 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

9 % IACS
5.5 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.92×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.56 µΩ·in
3.13×10⁻⁷ Ω·m12.3 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.25 V
-0.19 V

Corrosion Resistance

65 / 100
62 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Weldability

40 / 100
50 / 100

Formability (cold)

55 / 100
60 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

80 / 100
85 / 100

Same in both: Machinability 30 / 100 · Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 20% · Polishability 90 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

65 MJ/kg27,945 BTU/lb
72 MJ/kg30,954 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.6 kg CO₂/kg
5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

250 L/kg30 gal/lb
320 L/kg38.3 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 40%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

57 kN·m/kg
59 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

14.2 MN·m/kg
14.3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

711 kJ/m³
809 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

13.7 mm²/s
8.8 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

11
7

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC75700C76200

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC75700C76200
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C75700 vs C76200 — frequently asked

Is C76200 stronger than C75700?

Yes. C76200 has a typical yield strength of 448 MPa (65 ksi) against 420 MPa (60.9 ksi) for C75700 — about 7% more. Tensile strength is 517 MPa (75 ksi) vs 496 MPa (71.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C75700 or C76200?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, C75700 or C76200?

C76200. Its weldability rates fair (50/100) against fair (40/100) for C75700.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C75700 and C76200 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.