FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C75200 vs C75700

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C75200 and C75700 are both copper alloy grades. Both yield at about 427 MPa — strength does not separate them. C75700 is the more ductile: elongation 10% versus 6% for C75200, and C75200 is harder (160 HB vs 135 HB). C75700 conducts heat better (45 W/m·K vs 33 W/m·K).

C75700Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

C75200 vs C75700: properties

C75200C75700

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

125 GPa18.1 Msi
124 GPa18 Msi

Shear Modulus

47 GPa6.8 Msi
46 GPa6.7 Msi

Bulk Modulus

122 GPa17.7 Msi
130 GPa18.9 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.33
0.34

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

517 MPa75 ksi
496 MPa71.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

427 MPa61.9 ksi
420 MPa60.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

6%
10%

Shear Strength

330 MPa47.9 ksi
320 MPa46.4 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

185 MPa26.8 ksi
180 MPa26.1 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

160 HB
135 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

85 HRB
74 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

170 HV
145 HV

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.73 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
8.72 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,021°C1,870 °F
1,004°C1,839 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,110°C2,030 °F
1,038°C1,900 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

33 W/m·K19.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
45 W/m·K26 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

200 J/g86 BTU/lb
180 J/g77.4 BTU/lb

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 16.2 µm/m·K9 µin/in·°F · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 200°C392 °F · Min Service Temperature -200°C-328 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

6 % IACS
9 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.87×10⁻⁷ Ω·m11.3 µΩ·in
1.92×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.56 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.26 V
-0.25 V

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 65 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

25 / 100
30 / 100

Weldability

45 / 100
40 / 100

Formability (cold)

50 / 100
55 / 100

Castability

40 / 100
—

Brazeability / Solderability

85 / 100
80 / 100

Polishability

92 / 100
90 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 20%

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

82 MJ/kg35,254 BTU/lb
65 MJ/kg27,945 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5.6 kg CO₂/kg
4.6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

320 L/kg38.3 gal/lb
250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 40%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

59 kN·m/kg
57 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

14.3 MN·m/kg
14.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

729 kJ/m³
711 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

10 mm²/s
13.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

8
11

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC75200C75700

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC75200C75700
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C75200 vs C75700 — frequently asked

What is the difference between C75200 and C75700?

Copper Alloy C75200 and C75700 are both copper alloy grades. Both yield at about 427 MPa — strength does not separate them. C75700 is the more ductile: elongation 10% versus 6% for C75200, and C75200 is harder (160 HB vs 135 HB).

Which is cheaper, C75200 or C75700?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, C75200 or C75700?

C75700, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 30/100 against 25/100 for C75200; for welding the order is C75200 first (fair, 45/100) then C75700 (fair, 40/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C75200 and C75700 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.