FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C50200 vs C51000

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C50200 and C51000 are both copper alloy grades. C50200 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 320 MPa (46.4 ksi) against 140 MPa (20.3 ksi) for C51000, about 129% more; tensile strength follows at 370 MPa (53.7 ksi) vs 340 MPa (49.3 ksi). In exchange, C51000 is the more ductile: elongation 60% versus 12% for C50200, and C50200 is harder (112 HB vs 80 HB). C51000 runs hotter in service (200°C vs 150°C continuous) and C50200 conducts heat better (215 W/m·K vs 69 W/m·K). On the shop floor, C50200 welds better (good vs fair) and C50200 sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than C51000 (specialty, $$$$$).

C50200Choose it when strength drives the design, or when it will be welded.

C51000Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

C50200 vs C51000: properties

C50200C51000

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

115 GPa16.7 Msi
110 GPa16 Msi

Shear Modulus

44 GPa6.4 Msi
41 GPa5.9 Msi

Bulk Modulus

125 GPa18.1 Msi
115 GPa16.7 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

370 MPa53.7 ksi
340 MPa49.3 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

320 MPa46.4 ksi
140 MPa20.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

12%
60%

Reduction in Area

40%
—

Compressive Strength

325 MPa47.1 ksi
—

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

40 J29.5 ft·lbf
—

Hardness, Brinell

112 HB
80 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

62 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

120 HV
85 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.34 · Shear Strength 235 MPa34.1 ksi · Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit) 150 MPa21.8 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.89 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
8.86 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,060°C1,940 °F
954°C1,749 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,080°C1,976 °F
1,049°C1,920 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

215 W/m·K124 BTU/hr·ft·°F
69 W/m·K39.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F
380 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

205 J/g88.1 BTU/lb
200 J/g86 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

150°C302 °F
200°C392 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-200°C-328 °F

Same in both: Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 17.8 µm/m·K9.9 µin/in·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

55 % IACS
15 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.13×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.23 µΩ·in
1.15×10⁻⁷ Ω·m4.53 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

65 / 100
68 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.3 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

30 / 100
25 / 100

Weldability

55 / 100
45 / 100

Formability (cold)

60 / 100
90 / 100

Castability

—
30 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 20% · Brazeability / Solderability 90 / 100 · Polishability 75 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

57 MJ/kg24,506 BTU/lb
68 MJ/kg29,235 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.9 kg CO₂/kg
4.3 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb
260 L/kg31.2 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 40%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

42 kN·m/kg
38 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

12.9 MN·m/kg
12.4 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

445 kJ/m³
89 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

64.1 mm²/s
20.5 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

39
12

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC51000C50200

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC50200C51000
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Default condition—O
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$$ Specialty
Min. machined wall—0.8 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 1.6 µm
Chrome Plating—Yes
Electropolishing—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Tin Plating—Yes

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C50200 vs C51000 — frequently asked

Is C50200 stronger than C51000?

Yes. C50200 has a typical yield strength of 320 MPa (46.4 ksi) against 140 MPa (20.3 ksi) for C51000 — about 129% more. Tensile strength is 370 MPa (53.7 ksi) vs 340 MPa (49.3 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C50200 or C51000?

C50200 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while C51000 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, C50200 or C51000?

C50200, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 30/100 against 25/100 for C51000; for welding the order is C50200 first (good, 55/100) then C51000 (fair, 45/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C50200 and C51000 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.