FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C35300 vs C38500

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C35300 and C38500 are both copper alloy grades. C35300 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 345 MPa (50 ksi) against 170 MPa (24.7 ksi) for C38500, about 103% more. In exchange, C38500 is the more ductile: elongation 30% versus 20% for C35300, and C35300 is harder (115 HB vs 100 HB). C38500 runs hotter in service (200°C vs 150°C continuous). On the shop floor, C38500 machines more easily (excellent vs very good).

C35300Choose it when strength drives the design.

C38500Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

C35300 vs C38500: properties

C35300C38500

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Bulk Modulus

112 GPa16.2 Msi
110 GPa16 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

420 MPa60.9 ksi
415 MPa60.2 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

345 MPa50 ksi
170 MPa24.7 ksi

Elongation at Break

20%
30%

Shear Strength

290 MPa42.1 ksi
275 MPa39.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

140 MPa20.3 ksi
125 MPa18.1 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

115 HB
100 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

70 HRB
60 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

125 HV
105 HV

Reduction in Area

—
40%

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
20 J14.8 ft·lbf

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 97 GPa14.1 Msi · Shear Modulus 37 GPa5.4 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.34

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

888°C1,630 °F
875°C1,607 °F

Liquidus Temperature

899°C1,650 °F
890°C1,634 °F

Same in both: Density 8.47 g/cm³0.31 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

115 W/m·K66.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F
123 W/m·K71.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

20.3 µm/m·K11.3 µin/in·°F
20.9 µm/m·K11.6 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

150°C302 °F
200°C392 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 380 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 160 J/g68.8 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -200°C-328 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

26 % IACS
27 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

6.6×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.6 µΩ·in
6.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.52 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.28 V
-0.25 V

Corrosion Resistance

45 / 100
55 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

70 / 100
90 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

180%
270%

Weldability

15 / 100
20 / 100

Formability (cold)

55 / 100
30 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

70 / 100
85 / 100

Polishability

75 / 100
85 / 100

Castability

—
60 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

58 MJ/kg24,936 BTU/lb
55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb

Embodied Water

220 L/kg26.4 gal/lb
250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

45%
80%

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 3.6 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

50 kN·m/kg
49 kN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

614 kJ/m³
149 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

35.7 mm²/s
38.2 mm²/s

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 11.5 MN·m/kg · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 25

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC35300C38500

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC35300C38500
Default conditionH02As Extruded
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.8 mm0.8 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µmRa 1.6 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining. Both take the same 9 finishes: Chrome Plating, Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Gold Plating, Nickel Plating, Painting, Silver Plating, Tin Plating.

C35300 vs C38500 — frequently asked

Is C35300 stronger than C38500?

Yes. C35300 has a typical yield strength of 345 MPa (50 ksi) against 170 MPa (24.7 ksi) for C38500 — about 103% more. Tensile strength is 420 MPa (60.9 ksi) vs 415 MPa (60.2 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C35300 or C38500?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, C35300 or C38500?

C38500. Its machinability rates excellent (90/100) against very good (70/100) for C35300; for welding the order is C38500 first (poor, 20/100) then C35300 (poor, 15/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C35300 and C38500 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.