FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C18200 vs CuCrZr

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C18200 and CuCrZr are both copper alloy grades. C18200 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 430 MPa (62.4 ksi) against 350 MPa (50.8 ksi) for CuCrZr, about 23% more; tensile strength follows at 500 MPa (72.5 ksi) vs 430 MPa (62.4 ksi). In exchange, CuCrZr is the more ductile: elongation 22% versus 18% for C18200, and C18200 is harder (140 HB vs 130 HB). CuCrZr is stiffer (125 GPa vs 117 GPa) and CuCrZr runs hotter in service (450°C vs 400°C continuous). On the shop floor, CuCrZr welds better (fair vs poor) and CuCrZr sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than C18200 (high, $$$$).

C18200Choose it when strength drives the design.

CuCrZrChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

C18200 vs CuCrZr: properties

C18200CuCrZr

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

117 GPa17 Msi
125 GPa18.1 Msi

Shear Modulus

44 GPa6.4 Msi
47 GPa6.8 Msi

Bulk Modulus

133 GPa19.3 Msi
137 GPa19.9 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

500 MPa72.5 ksi
430 MPa62.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

430 MPa62.4 ksi
350 MPa50.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

18%
22%

Shear Strength

310 MPa45 ksi
270 MPa39.2 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

170 MPa24.7 ksi
150 MPa21.8 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

140 HB
130 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

77 HRB
75 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

145 HV
140 HV

Reduction in Area

—
40%

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
60 MPa·√m54.6 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
30 J22.1 ft·lbf

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.34

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Liquidus Temperature

1,080°C1,976 °F
1,085°C1,985 °F

Same in both: Density 8.89 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 1,070°C1,958 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

324 W/m·K187 BTU/hr·ft·°F
320 W/m·K185 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

17.6 µm/m·K9.8 µin/in·°F
17 µm/m·K9.4 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

400°C752 °F
450°C842 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 385 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 205 J/g88.1 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -200°C-328 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

82 % IACS
85 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.1×10⁻⁸ Ω·m0.827 µΩ·in
2.03×10⁻⁸ Ω·m0.799 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.3 V
-0.25 V

Corrosion Resistance

62 / 100
42 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

40 / 100
45 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

60%
30%

Weldability

30 / 100
50 / 100

Formability (cold)

35 / 100
40 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

75 / 100
60 / 100

Castability

—
50 / 100

Same in both: Polishability 70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.5 kg CO₂/kg
3.9 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

350 L/kg41.9 gal/lb
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

30%
25%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 57 MJ/kg24,506 BTU/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

56 kN·m/kg
48 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

13.2 MN·m/kg
14.1 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

790 kJ/m³
490 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

94.7 mm²/s
93.5 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

79
65

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleCuCrZrC18200

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC18200CuCrZr
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
3D printing—Yes
Default conditionHAged
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
Chrome PlatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Tin PlatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C18200 vs CuCrZr — frequently asked

Is C18200 stronger than CuCrZr?

Yes. C18200 has a typical yield strength of 430 MPa (62.4 ksi) against 350 MPa (50.8 ksi) for CuCrZr — about 23% more. Tensile strength is 500 MPa (72.5 ksi) vs 430 MPa (62.4 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C18200 or CuCrZr?

CuCrZr is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while C18200 is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, C18200 or CuCrZr?

CuCrZr, by a small margin. Both rate fair for machinability — 45/100 against 40/100 for C18200; for welding the order is CuCrZr first (fair, 50/100) then C18200 (poor, 30/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C18200 and CuCrZr side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.