FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C15100 vs C18200

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C15100 and C18200 are both copper alloy grades. C18200 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 430 MPa (62.4 ksi) against 330 MPa (47.9 ksi) for C15100, about 30% more; tensile strength follows at 500 MPa (72.5 ksi) vs 360 MPa (52.2 ksi). C18200 is the more ductile: elongation 18% versus 6% for C15100, and C18200 is harder (140 HB vs 105 HB). C15100 runs hotter in service (450°C vs 400°C continuous) and C15100 conducts electricity better (92 % IACS vs 82 % IACS). On the shop floor, C18200 machines more easily (fair vs poor) and C15100 welds better (fair vs poor).

C15100Choose it when the part sees heat, or when it will be welded.

C18200Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

C15100 vs C18200: properties

C15100C18200

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

120 GPa17.4 Msi
117 GPa17 Msi

Shear Modulus

45 GPa6.5 Msi
44 GPa6.4 Msi

Bulk Modulus

140 GPa20.3 Msi
133 GPa19.3 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.33
0.34

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

360 MPa52.2 ksi
500 MPa72.5 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

330 MPa47.9 ksi
430 MPa62.4 ksi

Elongation at Break

6%
18%

Shear Strength

215 MPa31.2 ksi
310 MPa45 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

150 MPa21.8 ksi
170 MPa24.7 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

105 HB
140 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

62 HRB
77 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

115 HV
145 HV

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,080°C1,976 °F
1,070°C1,958 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,085°C1,985 °F
1,080°C1,976 °F

Same in both: Density 8.89 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

350 W/m·K202 BTU/hr·ft·°F
324 W/m·K187 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

450°C842 °F
400°C752 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 385 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 17.6 µm/m·K9.8 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 205 J/g88.1 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -200°C-328 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

92 % IACS
82 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.87×10⁻⁸ Ω·m0.736 µΩ·in
2.1×10⁻⁸ Ω·m0.827 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.2 V
-0.3 V

Corrosion Resistance

60 / 100
62 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

22 / 100
40 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

20%
60%

Weldability

45 / 100
30 / 100

Formability (cold)

40 / 100
35 / 100

Castability

45 / 100
—

Brazeability / Solderability

70 / 100
75 / 100

Same in both: Polishability 70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb
57 MJ/kg24,506 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.8 kg CO₂/kg
3.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

250 L/kg30 gal/lb
350 L/kg41.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

25%
30%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

40 kN·m/kg
56 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

13.5 MN·m/kg
13.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

454 kJ/m³
790 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

102.3 mm²/s
94.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

60
79

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC18200C15100

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC15100C18200
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Default condition—H
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall—0.8 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 1.6 µm
Chrome Plating—Yes
Electropolishing—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Tin Plating—Yes

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C15100 vs C18200 — frequently asked

Is C18200 stronger than C15100?

Yes. C18200 has a typical yield strength of 430 MPa (62.4 ksi) against 330 MPa (47.9 ksi) for C15100 — about 30% more. Tensile strength is 500 MPa (72.5 ksi) vs 360 MPa (52.2 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C15100 or C18200?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, C15100 or C18200?

C18200. Its machinability rates fair (40/100) against poor (22/100) for C15100; for welding the order is C15100 first (fair, 45/100) then C18200 (poor, 30/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C15100 and C18200 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.