FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C17300 vs CuCrZr

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C17300 and CuCrZr are both copper alloy grades. CuCrZr is the stronger of the two: yield strength 350 MPa (50.8 ksi) against 220 MPa (31.9 ksi) for C17300, about 59% more. In exchange, C17300 is the more ductile: elongation 40% versus 22% for CuCrZr, and CuCrZr is harder (130 HB vs 110 HB). C17300 is lighter (8.26 g/cm³ vs 8.89 g/cm³ for CuCrZr) and CuCrZr runs hotter in service (450°C vs 150°C continuous). On the shop floor, CuCrZr welds better (fair vs poor) and CuCrZr sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than C17300 (specialty, $$$$$).

C17300Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

CuCrZrChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

C17300 vs CuCrZr: properties

C17300CuCrZr

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

128 GPa18.6 Msi
125 GPa18.1 Msi

Shear Modulus

50 GPa7.3 Msi
47 GPa6.8 Msi

Bulk Modulus

115 GPa16.7 Msi
137 GPa19.9 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.3
0.34

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

470 MPa68.2 ksi
430 MPa62.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

220 MPa31.9 ksi
350 MPa50.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

40%
22%

Reduction in Area

50%
40%

Shear Strength

310 MPa45 ksi
270 MPa39.2 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

210 MPa30.5 ksi
150 MPa21.8 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

110 HB
130 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

60 HRB
75 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

115 HV
140 HV

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
60 MPa·√m54.6 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
30 J22.1 ft·lbf

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.26 g/cm³0.3 lb/in³
8.89 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

865°C1,589 °F
1,070°C1,958 °F

Liquidus Temperature

980°C1,796 °F
1,085°C1,985 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

105 W/m·K60.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F
320 W/m·K185 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

420 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F
385 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

17.5 µm/m·K9.7 µin/in·°F
17 µm/m·K9.4 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

200 J/g86 BTU/lb
205 J/g88.1 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

150°C302 °F
450°C842 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -200°C-328 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

18 % IACS
85 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

9.6×10⁻⁸ Ω·m3.78 µΩ·in
2.03×10⁻⁸ Ω·m0.799 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.23 V
-0.25 V

Corrosion Resistance

62 / 100
42 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

50 / 100
45 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

50%
30%

Weldability

15 / 100
50 / 100

Formability (cold)

70 / 100
40 / 100

Castability

45 / 100
50 / 100

Polishability

75 / 100
70 / 100

Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 60 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

120 MJ/kg51,591 BTU/lb
57 MJ/kg24,506 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

7.5 kg CO₂/kg
3.9 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

350 L/kg41.9 gal/lb
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

35%
25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

57 kN·m/kg
48 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

15.5 MN·m/kg
14.1 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

189 kJ/m³
490 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

30.3 mm²/s
93.5 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

22
65

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleCuCrZrC17300

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC17300CuCrZr
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
3D printing—Yes
Default conditionAAged
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
Chrome PlatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Tin PlatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C17300 vs CuCrZr — frequently asked

Is CuCrZr stronger than C17300?

Yes. CuCrZr has a typical yield strength of 350 MPa (50.8 ksi) against 220 MPa (31.9 ksi) for C17300 — about 59% more. Tensile strength is 430 MPa (62.4 ksi) vs 470 MPa (68.2 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C17300 or CuCrZr?

CuCrZr is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while C17300 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, C17300 or CuCrZr?

C17300, by a small margin. Both rate fair for machinability — 50/100 against 45/100 for CuCrZr; for welding the order is CuCrZr first (fair, 50/100) then C17300 (poor, 15/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C17300 and CuCrZr side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.