Copper Alloy C17200 vs GRCop-84
Copper Alloy · grade comparison
Copper Alloy C17200 and GRCop-84 are both copper alloy grades. GRCop-84 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 420 MPa (60.9 ksi) against 260 MPa (37.7 ksi) for C17200, about 62% more; tensile strength follows at 530 MPa (76.9 ksi) vs 490 MPa (71.1 ksi). In exchange, C17200 is the more ductile: elongation 45% versus 22% for GRCop-84, and GRCop-84 is harder (140 HB vs 105 HB). C17200 is lighter (8.26 g/cm³ vs 8.76 g/cm³ for GRCop-84) and GRCop-84 runs hotter in service (800°C vs 150°C continuous). On the shop floor, GRCop-84 machines more easily (45 vs 35 out of 100), GRCop-84 welds better (good vs fair), and GRCop-84 sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than C17200 (specialty, $$$$$).
C17200Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.
GRCop-84Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.
C17200 vs GRCop-84: propertiesHow to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all copper alloy grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
How to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all copper alloy grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
Mechanical
Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.
Shear Modulus
Bulk Modulus
Poisson's Ratio
Tensile Strength (Ultimate)
Yield Strength (0.2% offset)
Elongation at Break
Reduction in Area
Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)
Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)
Hardness, Brinell
Hardness, Rockwell B
Hardness, Vickers
Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 128 GPa18.6 Msi · Shear Strength 320 MPa46.4 ksi
Physical
Density and transition temperatures.
Density
Melting Point (Solidus)
Liquidus Temperature
Thermal
How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.
Thermal Conductivity
Specific Heat Capacity
Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)
Max Service Temperature (continuous)
Min Service Temperature
Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 205 J/g88.1 BTU/lb
Electrical
Conductivity and insulation.
Electrical Conductivity
Electrical Resistivity
Chemical & Environmental
Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).
Corrosion Resistance
Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.25 V
Manufacturability
FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.
Machinability
Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)
Weldability
Formability (cold)
Castability
Brazeability / Solderability
Polishability
Sustainability
Primary-production footprint per kilogram.
Embodied Energy (primary production)
Embodied Carbon (primary production)
Embodied Water
Typical Recycled Content
Common Calculations
Ratios derived from the values above.
Specific Strength (UTS / density)
Specific Stiffness (E / density)
Modulus of Resilience
Thermal Diffusivity
Thermal Shock Resistance Index
Strength versus weight
Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.
Manufacturing and finishing
| Capability | C17200 | GRCop-84 |
|---|---|---|
| CNC machining | Yes | — |
| Sheet metal | Yes | — |
| Default condition | A | — |
| Relative cost | $$$$$ Specialty | $$$$ High |
| Min. machined wall | 0.8 mm | — |
| Best machined surface | Ra 1.6 µm | — |
| Chrome Plating | Yes | — |
| Electropolishing | Yes | — |
| Nickel Plating | Yes | — |
| Painting | Yes | — |
| Tin Plating | Yes | — |
They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.
C17200 vs GRCop-84 — frequently asked
Is GRCop-84 stronger than C17200?
Yes. GRCop-84 has a typical yield strength of 420 MPa (60.9 ksi) against 260 MPa (37.7 ksi) for C17200 — about 62% more. Tensile strength is 530 MPa (76.9 ksi) vs 490 MPa (71.1 ksi).
Which is cheaper, C17200 or GRCop-84?
GRCop-84 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while C17200 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.
Which is easier to machine, C17200 or GRCop-84?
GRCop-84, by a small margin. Both rate fair for machinability — 45/100 against 35/100 for C17200; for welding the order is GRCop-84 first (good, 55/100) then C17200 (fair, 45/100).
Ready to make it?
Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C17200 and GRCop-84 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.
Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.