FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C14500 vs C19200

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C14500 and C19200 are both copper alloy grades. C14500 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) against 235 MPa (34.1 ksi) for C19200, about 17% more. In exchange, C19200 is the more ductile: elongation 20% versus 18% for C14500, and C14500 is harder (85 HB vs 80 HB). C14500 conducts heat better (350 W/m·K vs 215 W/m·K). On the shop floor, C14500 machines more easily (excellent vs poor) and C19200 welds better (good vs poor).

C14500Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.

C19200Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when it will be welded.

C14500 vs C19200: properties

C14500C19200

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Bulk Modulus

140 GPa20.3 Msi
133 GPa19.3 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

310 MPa45 ksi
305 MPa44.2 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

275 MPa39.9 ksi
235 MPa34.1 ksi

Elongation at Break

18%
20%

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

95 MPa13.8 ksi
115 MPa16.7 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

85 HB
80 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

40 HRB
—

Reduction in Area

—
55%

Hardness, Vickers

—
90 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 117 GPa17 Msi · Shear Modulus 44 GPa6.4 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.34 · Shear Strength 195 MPa28.3 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.94 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
8.91 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,051°C1,924 °F
1,075°C1,967 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,065°C1,949 °F
1,085°C1,985 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

350 W/m·K202 BTU/hr·ft·°F
215 W/m·K124 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Min Service Temperature

-200°C-328 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 385 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 17.6 µm/m·K9.8 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 205 J/g88.1 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 200°C392 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

92 % IACS
60 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.87×10⁻⁸ Ω·m0.736 µΩ·in
2.87×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.13 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

65 / 100
62 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.2 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

85 / 100
28 / 100

Weldability

25 / 100
60 / 100

Formability (cold)

40 / 100
82 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

90 / 100
95 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
75 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

—
20%

Castability

—
35 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

57 MJ/kg24,506 BTU/lb
55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb

Embodied Water

260 L/kg31.2 gal/lb
250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 3.6 kg CO₂/kg · Typical Recycled Content 35%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

35 kN·m/kg
34 kN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

323 kJ/m³
236 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

101.7 mm²/s
62.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

53
32

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 13.1 MN·m/kg

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC14500C19200

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC14500C19200
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default conditionH02—
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
Chrome PlatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Tin PlatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C14500 vs C19200 — frequently asked

Is C14500 stronger than C19200?

Yes. C14500 has a typical yield strength of 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) against 235 MPa (34.1 ksi) for C19200 — about 17% more. Tensile strength is 310 MPa (45 ksi) vs 305 MPa (44.2 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C14500 or C19200?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, C14500 or C19200?

C14500. Its machinability rates excellent (85/100) against poor (28/100) for C19200; for welding the order is C19200 first (good, 60/100) then C14500 (poor, 25/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C14500 and C19200 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.