FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy AlBC4 vs C84800

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy AlBC4 and C84800 are both copper alloy grades. AlBC4 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) against 124 MPa (18 ksi) for C84800, about 122% more; tensile strength follows at 620 MPa (89.9 ksi) vs 262 MPa (38 ksi). In exchange, C84800 is the more ductile: elongation 35% versus 20% for AlBC4, and AlBC4 is harder (159 HB vs 55 HB). AlBC4 is lighter (7.64 g/cm³ vs 8.55 g/cm³ for C84800) and AlBC4 is stiffer (117 GPa vs 86 GPa). On the shop floor, C84800 machines more easily (excellent vs poor), AlBC4 welds better (very good vs poor), and AlBC4 sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than C84800 (specialty, $$$$$).

AlBC4Choose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

C84800Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

AlBC4 vs C84800: properties

AlBC4C84800

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

117 GPa17 Msi
86 GPa12.5 Msi

Shear Modulus

44 GPa6.4 Msi
32 GPa4.6 Msi

Bulk Modulus

108 GPa15.7 Msi
105 GPa15.2 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.32
0.34

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

620 MPa89.9 ksi
262 MPa38 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

275 MPa39.9 ksi
124 MPa18 ksi

Elongation at Break

20%
35%

Reduction in Area

22%
—

Compressive Strength

600 MPa87 ksi
—

Shear Strength

400 MPa58 ksi
190 MPa27.6 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

235 MPa34.1 ksi
76 MPa11 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

50 MPa·√m45.5 ksi·√in
—

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

30 J22.1 ft·lbf
—

Hardness, Brinell

159 HB
55 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

83 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

168 HV
—

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.64 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
8.55 g/cm³0.31 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,043°C1,909 °F
843°C1,549 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,060°C1,940 °F
1,010°C1,850 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

42 W/m·K24.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F
72 W/m·K41.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

419 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F
377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

16.2 µm/m·K9 µin/in·°F
18 µm/m·K10 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

210 J/g90.3 BTU/lb
170 J/g73.1 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

300°C572 °F
200°C392 °F

Min Service Temperature

-200°C-328 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

7.1 % IACS
16 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.43×10⁻⁷ Ω·m9.57 µΩ·in
1.08×10⁻⁷ Ω·m4.25 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

78 / 100
58 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.25 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

32 / 100
88 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

30%
—

Weldability

70 / 100
20 / 100

Formability (cold)

25 / 100
—

Castability

72 / 100
90 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

25 / 100
60 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb
45 MJ/kg19,347 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.2 kg CO₂/kg
3 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

40%
85%

Same in both: Embodied Water 250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

81 kN·m/kg
31 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

15.3 MN·m/kg
10.1 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

323 kJ/m³
89 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

13.1 mm²/s
22.3 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

14
12

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC84800AlBC4

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityAlBC4C84800
CNC machining—Yes
Default condition—As Cast
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$$ Specialty
Min. machined wall—0.8 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 1.6 µm
Chrome Plating—Yes
Electropolishing—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Tin Plating—Yes

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

AlBC4 vs C84800 — frequently asked

Is AlBC4 stronger than C84800?

Yes. AlBC4 has a typical yield strength of 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) against 124 MPa (18 ksi) for C84800 — about 122% more. Tensile strength is 620 MPa (89.9 ksi) vs 262 MPa (38 ksi).

Which is cheaper, AlBC4 or C84800?

AlBC4 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while C84800 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, AlBC4 or C84800?

C84800. Its machinability rates excellent (88/100) against poor (32/100) for AlBC4; for welding the order is AlBC4 first (very good, 70/100) then C84800 (poor, 20/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in AlBC4 and C84800 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.