FabDigitFabDigit

P100 vs T300

Composite · grade comparison

P100 and T300 are both composite grades. T300 is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 3,530 MPa (512 ksi) against 2,410 MPa (350 ksi) for P100, about 46% more. T300 is the more ductile: elongation 1.5% versus 0.32% for P100. T300 is lighter (1.76 g/cm³ vs 2.15 g/cm³ for P100) and P100 is stiffer (758 GPa vs 230 GPa). On the shop floor, T300 machines more easily (poor vs not recommended).

P100Choose it when the part sees heat.

T300Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

P100 vs T300: properties

P100T300

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

758 GPa110 Msi
230 GPa33.4 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

2,410 MPa350 ksi
3,530 MPa512 ksi

Elongation at Break

0.32%
1.5%

Compressive Strength

—
1,570 MPa228 ksi

Flexural Strength

—
1,700 MPa247 ksi

Shear Strength

—
90 MPa13.1 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.15 g/cm³0.08 lb/in³
1.76 g/cm³0.06 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

520 W/m·K300 BTU/hr·ft·°F
10.5 W/m·K6.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

710 J/kg·K0.17 BTU/lb·°F
750 J/kg·K0.18 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

-1.5 µm/m·K-0.81 µin/in·°F
-0.41 µm/m·K-0.23 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

400°C752 °F
350°C662 °F

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

2,000°C3,632 °F
500°C932 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -269°C-452 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

2.5×10⁻⁶ Ω·m98.4 µΩ·in
1.7×10⁻⁵ Ω·m669 µΩ·in

Volume Resistivity

—
0 Ω·cm

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

88 / 100
92 / 100

Same in both: UV / Weathering Resistance 95 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

12 / 100
25 / 100

Polishability

—
55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

750 MJ/kg322,442 BTU/lb
400 MJ/kg171,969 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

45 kg CO₂/kg
26 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

—
700 L/kg83.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

1,121 kN·m/kg
2,006 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

352.6 MN·m/kg
130.7 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

340.6 mm²/s
8 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

-1,140
-393

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every composite grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

1101001,000510Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityP100T300
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

P100 vs T300 — frequently asked

Is T300 stronger than P100?

Yes. T300 has a typical tensile strength of 3,530 MPa (512 ksi) against 2,410 MPa (350 ksi) for P100 — about 46% more.

Which is cheaper, P100 or T300?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, P100 or T300?

T300. Its machinability rates poor (25/100) against not recommended (12/100) for P100.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in P100 and T300 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.