FabDigitFabDigit

HTS40 vs T300

Composite · grade comparison

HTS40 and T300 are both composite grades. HTS40 is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 4,300 MPa (624 ksi) against 3,530 MPa (512 ksi) for T300, about 22% more. HTS40 is the more ductile: elongation 1.8% versus 1.5% for T300.

HTS40Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

HTS40 vs T300: properties

HTS40T300

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

240 GPa34.8 Msi
230 GPa33.4 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.27
—

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

4,300 MPa624 ksi
3,530 MPa512 ksi

Elongation at Break

1.8%
1.5%

Compressive Strength

1,400 MPa203 ksi
1,570 MPa228 ksi

Flexural Strength

1,650 MPa239 ksi
1,700 MPa247 ksi

Flexural Modulus

125 GPa18.1 Msi
—

Shear Strength

95 MPa13.8 ksi
90 MPa13.1 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.77 g/cm³0.06 lb/in³
1.76 g/cm³0.06 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

10 W/m·K5.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F
10.5 W/m·K6.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

-0.1 µm/m·K-0.06 µin/in·°F
-0.41 µm/m·K-0.23 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

—
500°C932 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 750 J/kg·K0.18 BTU/lb·°F · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 350°C662 °F · Min Service Temperature -269°C-452 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1.6×10⁻⁵ Ω·m630 µΩ·in
1.7×10⁻⁵ Ω·m669 µΩ·in

Volume Resistivity

—
0 Ω·cm

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 92 / 100 · UV / Weathering Resistance 95 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

20 / 100
25 / 100

Polishability

—
55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

340 MJ/kg146,174 BTU/lb
400 MJ/kg171,969 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

24 kg CO₂/kg
26 kg CO₂/kg

Same in both: Embodied Water 700 L/kg83.9 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

2,429 kN·m/kg
2,006 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

135.6 MN·m/kg
130.7 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

7.5 mm²/s
8 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

-1,792
-393

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every composite grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

1101001,000510Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityHTS40T300
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

HTS40 vs T300 — frequently asked

Is HTS40 stronger than T300?

Yes. HTS40 has a typical tensile strength of 4,300 MPa (624 ksi) against 3,530 MPa (512 ksi) for T300 — about 22% more.

Which is cheaper, HTS40 or T300?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, HTS40 or T300?

T300, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 25/100 against 20/100 for HTS40.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in HTS40 and T300 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.